We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Do i need my indirect water tank on?
Comments
-
Actually, if you’ll forgive the pedantry of describing what is arguably an edge case, there’s nothing stopping you using a combi with an unvented cylinder if you disconnect the mains inlet and DHW outlet and instead use external valves to divert the primary circuit output to the CH and DHW as required. Whilst not all that commonplace it is sometimes done when properties are extended to include additional wet rooms that exceed the capacity of the pre-existing combi boiler but without having the (unnecessary) expense of replacing the boiler as well as adding the cylinder. To be fair though, I would concede that this makes it no longer a combi despite that being what the label might still say!markin said:as the is an Indirect unvented hot water cylinder It must be a system0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards