We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Tax - close to bands
Comments
-
EthicsGradient said:
Yes, they do use allowances in the order that benefits the taxpayer. But it's also the "normal" way they express it - look at earned/pension income first, then savings interest.AmityNeon said:Allocating £270 of the Personal Allowance towards savings income so the full £37,700 Basic rate band is utilised would be more tax efficient, but I'm not sure whether HMRC automatically allocates the Personal Allowance in a manner that maximises savings for the taxpayer.I think a lot of 'worked examples' I've come across usually show nil rate bands using up the Basic rate band, causing more savings/dividend income to be taxed at the Higher rate. Very rarely is reallocation of the Personal Allowance mentioned (usually only by websites specialising in tax/accountacy).
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards