We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Non-partisan mini-budget predictions thread
Comments
-
Investors shafted0
-
Strong possibility that the investment bond wrapper could come back into the mainstream again.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
What about the large and not necessarily wealthy demographic that does not currently pay NI, are they to be taxed at 32% rather than 20% for their base rate on all income?MattMattMattUK said:
It depends on the source, eg. standard income would be taxed as income, dividend as dividend etc.mebu60 said:
Earning or receiving? Huge difference.MattMattMattUK said:
I see it working exactly as intended, those who do not pay NI would pay the combined income tax rate rate, largely pensioners earning more than the LEL.mebu60 said:
How do you see this working?Combine Income tax and NI into one single Income Tax.
(I made an observation on this point earlier in the thread).
Base rate from LEL up to £50k would be 32%, although that should probably be increased.
Higher rate from £50-100k (ideally lowering the threshold for the additional rate) to 42%.
Higher rate from £100k upwards 47%.0 -
That was about as cynical as it could possibly have been. Began by saying the BOE had done a great job (their remit is to keep inflation to 2% and yesterday it hit 11.1%. You hafta wonder what a bad job would look like). Then went on to blame Putin and the Ukraine war as often as he could. From that point virtually every measure was clearly designed with one objective: try to minimise the ways Labour could accuse them of abusing the Most Vulnerable. And finally, having repeatedly promised no rabbits, they end with saying they're keeping the pension triple lock.
Rachel Reeves is on now, who will most probably manage to be even more revolting.3 -
-
In 2 years - next year, CGT allowance down to £6,000, dividend allowance to £1,000; in 2024-5 £3,000 and £500 respectively.mebu60 said:
https://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/news/chancellor-halves-cgt-allowance-to-6000/
3 -
The changes being made for investors sound terrible, I only get about £600 dividends per year so I'm not a big investor at all but looks like even I will be paying tax on that in a couple of years time
0 -
Perhaps the companies concerned will reduce their dividends as the recession takes hold....t1redmonkey said:The changes being made for investors sound terrible, I only get about £600 dividends per year so I'm not a big investor at all but looks like even I will be paying tax on that in a couple of years time
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



