BOE Interest Rate increased to 3%

«1345

Comments

  • ForumUser7
    ForumUser7 Posts: 2,373 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thanks for this @t1redmonkey
    I had read that economists were predicting a rise from anywhere between 0.5% and 1%, but likely 0.75%. It is interesting that no one voted 1%.
    If you want me to definitely see your reply, please tag me @forumuser7 Thank you.

    N.B. (Amended from Forum Rules): You must investigate, and check several times, before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my content, as nothing I post is advice, rather it is personal opinion and is solely for discussion purposes. I research before my posts, and I never intend to share anything that is misleading, misinforming, or out of date, but don't rely on everything you read. Some of the information changes quickly, is my own opinion or may be incorrect. Verify anything you read before acting on it to protect yourself because you are responsible for any action you consequently make... DYOR, YMMV etc.
  • Thanks for this @t1redmonkey
    I had read that economists were predicting a rise from anywhere between 0.5% and 1%, but likely 0.75%. It is interesting that no one voted 1%.
    Yes I think this is an interesting takeaway from the summary:

    The majority of the Committee judges that, should the economy evolve broadly in line with the latest Monetary Policy Report projections, further increases in Bank Rate may be required for a sustainable return of inflation to target, albeit to a peak lower than priced into financial markets.

    Also watching the BOE conference and Andrew Bailey has said that they are only trying to get inflation to 2%, not 0%.  So basically they are being cautious with future rate rises and trying to not overshoot the mark (i.e. damage the economy more than is necessary by rising rates too far).
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 36,338 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    t1redmonkey said:
    Also watching the BOE conference and Andrew Bailey has said that they are only trying to get inflation to 2%, not 0%. 
    Surely their target has been 2% for ages, why would they change that to 0%?
  • eskbanker said:
    t1redmonkey said:
    Also watching the BOE conference and Andrew Bailey has said that they are only trying to get inflation to 2%, not 0%. 
    Surely their target has been 2% for ages, why would they change that to 0%?
    They obviously wouldn't change it to 0%, it's just the way he answered the question and the fact he even said that that I think is interesting.  It's signalling they're being cautious and trying to not overshoot the mark (to me that was basically a dig at the US Fed who may well do that with the way they're going!).
  • The 0.75% raise today was accompanied by the obligatory doom-loop forecasts of recession and economic misery and talking down the future UK economy. The pound is tanking again. The Bank of England (BoE) has become the Bank against England (BaE).
  • In September they badly misjudged the market. Everyone else knew they had pitched the rise too low. Bailey tried to excuse their mistake but was very unconvincing.
    Now that the Fed and ECB had both increased by 75 points so the BOE had no option of an increase below 0.75%. Indeed they should perhaps have gone for 1% rise, thus strengthening sterling and helped reduce inflation on imported food and fuel.
    My take is that the BOE will need to push the rate much higher in 2023 because they have been both too timid and too slow.
  • biscan25
    biscan25 Posts: 452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Interesting views on here. My take is that the BoE remit is far too tightly defined, that being solely to control inflation.

    So from the report:
    • This flavour of inflation is self defeating
    • Raising base rate will damage employment
    • Raising base rate will crush growth
    But hell, lets raise base rate substantially anyway. I'm surprised that there was not more dissent. Economists are split on whether this is the best approach, or a combination of monetary and fiscal stimulus is the best way. The trouble is, fiscal matters are considered by the treasury/government, and monetary by BoE, so no collaborative outcome can be achieved.

    New government needed, independence of BoE needs to be revoked.
    Pensions actuary, Runner, Dog parent, Homeowner
  • The BaE is "predicting" the longest recession for a century.

    The Tories are crushing consumers with needless taxes.

    We are talking and taxing our country down into the gutter.
  • hallmark
    hallmark Posts: 1,458 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    biscan25 said:
    New government needed, independence of BoE needs to be revoked.
    Totally agree to revoke the current MPC setup.  But there's no material difference between either party anymore when it comes to the economy.  High taxes, massive overspending, and endlessly expanding the state. Sunak is basically Gordon Brown.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.