Right to repair or replacement, who chooses method?

davidbbdavidbb Forumite
10 Posts
Part of the Furniture First Post Combo Breaker
Forumite
As the title states. I bought a phone 5 months ago that has developed a fault, the retailer (also the manufacturer) refuse to offer a replacement as the phone is repairable (they haven't inspected it yet)

However, I was under the impression that particularly within the first 6 months repair or replacement is my choice as per section 23.

(6)A consumer who requires or agrees to the repair of goods cannot require the trader to replace them, or exercise the short-term right to reject, without giving the trader a reasonable time to repair them (unless giving the trader that time would cause significant inconvenience to the consumer).

(7)A consumer who requires or agrees to the replacement of goods cannot require the trader to repair them, or exercise the short-term right to reject, without giving the trader a reasonable time to replace them (unless giving the trader that time would cause significant inconvenience to the consumer).

The language to me indicates that if I require a replacement (or don't agree to a repair) it's my choice. I stated clearly when I contacted them that replacement would be best as turnaround would be quicker, leading to a shorter time without the device (ie. a repair is inconvenient)

Can someone clarify this for me before I reply.

TIA

Replies

  • powerful_Roguepowerful_Rogue Forumite
    6.8K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    davidbb said:
    As the title states. I bought a phone 5 months ago that has developed a fault, the retailer (also the manufacturer) refuse to offer a replacement as the phone is repairable (they haven't inspected it yet)

    However, I was under the impression that particularly within the first 6 months repair or replacement is my choice as per section 23.

    (6)A consumer who requires or agrees to the repair of goods cannot require the trader to replace them, or exercise the short-term right to reject, without giving the trader a reasonable time to repair them (unless giving the trader that time would cause significant inconvenience to the consumer).

    (7)A consumer who requires or agrees to the replacement of goods cannot require the trader to repair them, or exercise the short-term right to reject, without giving the trader a reasonable time to replace them (unless giving the trader that time would cause significant inconvenience to the consumer).

    The language to me indicates that if I require a replacement (or don't agree to a repair) it's my choice. I stated clearly when I contacted them that replacement would be best as turnaround would be quicker, leading to a shorter time without the device (ie. a repair is inconvenient)

    Can someone clarify this for me before I reply.

    TIA

    You can state your preference is a replacement, however they get to choose the most cost effective method, which I presume would be a repair.
  • shiraz99shiraz99 Forumite
    1.7K Posts
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    As you've quoted you cannot require the seller to replace or repair if the option "they" choose doesn't cause a significant inconvenience. In simpler terms it's the choice of the retailer.

    Being without a phone for a short period whilst it's repaired is unlikely to be classed as a significant inconvenience.
  • davidbbdavidbb Forumite
    10 Posts
    Part of the Furniture First Post Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    shiraz99 said:
    As you've quoted you cannot require the seller to replace or repair if the option "they" choose doesn't cause a significant inconvenience. In simpler terms it's the choice of the retailer.

    Being without a phone for a short period whilst it's repaired is unlikely to be classed as a significant inconvenience.
    Needing a phone for work is a pretty significant inconvenience IMO. As it stands it has to be sent to their distribution centre in Europe, then sent by them to their repair centre, repaired and then returned to the distribution centre before getting back to me. Turnaround time is 7-10 days.
  • shiraz99shiraz99 Forumite
    1.7K Posts
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    davidbb said:
    shiraz99 said:
    As you've quoted you cannot require the seller to replace or repair if the option "they" choose doesn't cause a significant inconvenience. In simpler terms it's the choice of the retailer.

    Being without a phone for a short period whilst it's repaired is unlikely to be classed as a significant inconvenience.
    Needing a phone for work is a pretty significant inconvenience IMO. As it stands it has to be sent to their distribution centre in Europe, then sent by them to their repair centre, repaired and then returned to the distribution centre before getting back to me. Turnaround time is 7-10 days.
    Surely having something so important to your job you would have a backup just in case, and as mentioned, if your phone is for business purposes then the CRA isn't applicable.
  • eskbankereskbanker Forumite
    25.3K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    OP will perhaps clarify but to me he's not saying that the phone is a business asset as such, but simply that his employer has an expectation of being able to contact him.  Having said that, perhaps the employer would be able or willing to lend a handset while OP's own phone is temporarily unavailable....
  • shiraz99shiraz99 Forumite
    1.7K Posts
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    eskbanker said:
    OP will perhaps clarify but to me he's not saying that the phone is a business asset as such, but simply that his employer has an expectation of being able to contact him.  Having said that, perhaps the employer would be able or willing to lend a handset while OP's own phone is temporarily unavailable....
    If that is the case then yes, I agree, you would reasonably expect the employer to provide a phone in such circumstances.
  • Manxman_in_exileManxman_in_exile Forumite
    8K Posts
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    @davidbb -   I think you also need to read s23(3) starting "The consumer canot require the trader to repair or replace ... " and s23(4).

    Regarding the part played by "significant inconvenience" in deciding whether to repair or replace, the trader can rely on the purpose you bought it for.  Did you tell them it was for your employer to keep in touch with you and perhaps therfore for (your employer's) business purposes?
  • zoobzoob Forumite
    535 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Argos sell pay as you go phones from £13.50 and you could install your existing sim to get you by
    It's also good idea to have a backup phone particularly if needed for work or that you always need to be in contact or be contacted 
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Did you know there's an MSE app?

It's free & available on iOS & Android

MSE App

Regifting: good idea or not?

Add your two cents to the discussion

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools