We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Energy Price Guarantee No Longer 2 years just 6 months at current level

1356738

Comments

  • ariarnia
    ariarnia Posts: 4,225 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 17 October 2022 at 12:31PM
    we can't really say what will happen from next april and going into next winter. could be that we even start to see deals for fixes a little under the cap by then (though i think 12 months might be a little optemistic for a recession to be over. does mean we wont' 'benifit' from this cap really at all as our current fix is due to end in march so only maybe two weeks on the cap before it changes. will certainly be active looking for a sense of the market before our fix ends just like every other time a fix has come to an end. 
    Almost everything will work again if you unplug it for a few minutes, including you. Anne Lamott

    It's amazing how those with a can-do attitude and willingness to 'pitch in and work' get all the luck, isn't it?

    Please consider buying some pet food and giving it to your local food bank collection or animal charity. Animals aren't to blame for the cost of living crisis.
  • mmmmikey
    mmmmikey Posts: 2,423 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Homepage Hero Name Dropper
    GingerTim said:
    sienew said:


    Like I said before the EPG was announced I am a big fan of proposals that gives every person an allowance of cheap/subsidised energy to provide for their basic need. If you go above that basic need the prices shouldn't be subsidised by the taxpayer.
    This is what's being strongly hinted at by Faisal Islam on the BBC.



    Or maybe the Rishi Sunak approach of giving every household the first £400 worth of energy for free and splitting that into 6 payments over the most expensive months of the year, and providing additional help on top of that for those that need it most. Sure, it could benefit from being finessed to better support the "squeezed middle" but not a bad idea IMHO.
  • sienew
    sienew Posts: 334 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    ariarnia said:
    we can't really say what will happen from next april and going into next winter. could be that we even start to see deals for fixes a little under the cap by then (though i think 12 months might be a little optemistic for a recession to be over. does mean we wont' 'benifit' from this cap really at all as our current fix is due to end in march so only maybe two weeks on the cap before it changes. will certainly be active looking for a sense of the market before our fix ends just like every other time a fix has come to an end. 
    If you see Auxilione's prediction for April you might change your mind on fixes below the cap. The prediction is scary. Very scary.
  • Freebird53
    Freebird53 Posts: 141 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 17 October 2022 at 12:37PM
    sienew said:
    ariarnia said:
    we can't really say what will happen from next april and going into next winter. could be that we even start to see deals for fixes a little under the cap by then (though i think 12 months might be a little optemistic for a recession to be over. does mean we wont' 'benifit' from this cap really at all as our current fix is due to end in march so only maybe two weeks on the cap before it changes. will certainly be active looking for a sense of the market before our fix ends just like every other time a fix has come to an end. 
    If you see Auxilione's prediction for April you might change your mind on fixes below the cap. The prediction is scary. Very scary.

    Would you expect anything else?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,211 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'd just like to comment that turning things off at the plug is one of the least effective energy saving measures. Modern electricals are designed to use a tiny amount of power when on standby. I often see it misreported in the news as a great energy saving measure and it simply isn't, doing any of the other things you suggested will save 10x what turning your tv off would ever do. 
    Problem is that many people dont have modern electricals.  Or they have budget items that lack the energy saving features.

    I do agree with you somewhat though.  Not all items save energy by being turned off unless for sufficient time.    Some of our items remain on standby.  The use of energy monitoring plugs can help tell which devices are best on standby or off.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • sienew
    sienew Posts: 334 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    mmmmikey said:
    GingerTim said:
    sienew said:


    Like I said before the EPG was announced I am a big fan of proposals that gives every person an allowance of cheap/subsidised energy to provide for their basic need. If you go above that basic need the prices shouldn't be subsidised by the taxpayer.
    This is what's being strongly hinted at by Faisal Islam on the BBC.



    Or maybe the Rishi Sunak approach of giving every household the first £400 worth of energy for free and splitting that into 6 payments over the most expensive months of the year, and providing additional help on top of that for those that need it most. Sure, it could benefit from being finessed to better support the "squeezed middle" but not a bad idea IMHO.
    Change it to per person instead of per household and I think that works better. By household is incredibly bad targeting, a student in a tiny 1 bedroom flat (who lets be honest is almost never home) doesn't need the same support as a family home with 4-5 people living in it. A grant per person works far better as it should allow for a basic usage for everyone in the household.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.