We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Vanguard LifeStrategy Funds

1235»

Comments

  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Altior said:
    Can anyone explain this:
     
    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund (Inc) price as at date 14 Oct 2022 £125.13

    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund (Acc) price As at date 14 Oct 2022 £125.68

    Distributing and accumulation versions are practically the same price, but they were incepted over 10 years ago ? 



    Probably because most current index linked gilts have a very low coupon eg 0.125%, plus the reinvestment of that 0.125% or whatever would likely mostly have been when the gilt prices were much higher, so would have sustained a capital loss.
    Not sure if that fully explains it though...

  • adindas
    adindas Posts: 6,856 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 15 October 2022 at 1:56PM
     I think his advice was to hold between 25% and 75% as stocks, ‘“The sound reason for increasing the percentage in common stocks [beyond 50%] would be the appearance of ‘bargain price’ levels created in a protracted bear market. Conversely, sound procedure would call for reducing the common-stock component below 50% when in the judgment of the investor the market level has become dangerously high.”.
    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/07/grahamprinciples.asp Benjamin Graham's Timeless Investment Principles
    Remember, Graham's philosophy was first and foremost, to preserve capital, and then to try to make it grow. He suggested having 25% to 75% of your investments in bonds and varying this based on market conditions. With regard to market condition, keep in mind we are currently in the bear market.
    His other suggestion is to take advantage of DCA to take advantage of dips in the price. In the past if a person dare to beg a difference you would get a fierce attack by the same group of vocal people here on MSEs. Just learn the hard lessons from the guys who threw lump sum a few hundred thousands pound early this year while those who were telling people to do so have never done that themselves.


  • Altior
    Altior Posts: 1,846 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles said:
    Altior said:
    Can anyone explain this:
     
    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund (Inc) price as at date 14 Oct 2022 £125.13

    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund (Acc) price As at date 14 Oct 2022 £125.68

    Distributing and accumulation versions are practically the same price, but they were incepted over 10 years ago ? 



    Probably because most current index linked gilts have a very low coupon eg 0.125%, plus the reinvestment of that 0.125% or whatever would likely mostly have been when the gilt prices were much higher, so would have sustained a capital loss.
    Not sure if that fully explains it though...


    Yes it wouldn't have been a great deal of income on the low coupon rates, but the distribution should accommodate inflation compensation as well.  
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Altior said:
    zagfles said:
    Altior said:
    Can anyone explain this:
     
    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund (Inc) price as at date 14 Oct 2022 £125.13

    Vanguard U.K. Inflation-Linked Gilt Index Fund (Acc) price As at date 14 Oct 2022 £125.68

    Distributing and accumulation versions are practically the same price, but they were incepted over 10 years ago ? 



    Probably because most current index linked gilts have a very low coupon eg 0.125%, plus the reinvestment of that 0.125% or whatever would likely mostly have been when the gilt prices were much higher, so would have sustained a capital loss.
    Not sure if that fully explains it though...


    Yes it wouldn't have been a great deal of income on the low coupon rates, but the distribution should accommodate inflation compensation as well.  
    But likely outweighed by capital loss on all reinvestments over the last 10 years.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.