We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
E: 31/10 Win Bremont goodies and more (daily, help please)
Options
Comments
-
Bremont did a Battle of Britain boxed pair of watches - One in honour of the Hurricane the other in the honour of the ......
Also had a free flight in the Other plane at Duxford included.1 -
greenteacups said:Koozie said:greenteacups said:Koozie said:andrew_g_scott said:Koozie said:Does anyone realize there is only ONE watch to win? If you keep posting answers, you are only hurting the rest of us! You are creating a larger pool of contestants with every answer you post. You should all be disqualified.
The simple fact is that Bremont have messed up here. This competition is ridiculous and a marketing failure. By making the competition unbelievably difficult and arguably no fun in the slightest, they are completely alienating fans and instead appealing to a very select group of individuals who simply like to enter competitions for fun, have no connection to the Bremont brand and really couldn't care less about the watch or the prize being from Bremont as a company. It is simply the joy of winning.
Will Bremont win any more customers from this competition? No. Have they improved brand awareness substantially? No. Have they spent a big chunk of cash on making a bespoke comp mini-website for very little gain? Absolutely.
Competitions (for a marketing gain) should appeal to a mass-audience and be fun and engaging. This is neither.Koozie said:greenteacups said:Koozie said:andrew_g_scott said:Koozie said:Does anyone realize there is only ONE watch to win? If you keep posting answers, you are only hurting the rest of us! You are creating a larger pool of contestants with every answer you post. You should all be disqualified.
The simple fact is that Bremont have messed up here. This competition is ridiculous and a marketing failure. By making the competition unbelievably difficult and arguably no fun in the slightest, they are completely alienating fans and instead appealing to a very select group of individuals who simply like to enter competitions for fun, have no connection to the Bremont brand and really couldn't care less about the watch or the prize being from Bremont as a company. It is simply the joy of winning.
Will Bremont win any more customers from this competition? No. Have they improved brand awareness substantially? No. Have they spent a big chunk of cash on making a bespoke comp mini-website for very little gain? Absolutely.
Competitions (for a marketing gain) should appeal to a mass-audience and be fun and engaging. This is neither.Since coming across the competition I have become a fan of Bremont and have learnt so much about the company along the way, following their socials etc. To be able to win a quality watch, which I would not be able to ordinerally afford or justify the cost due to other more important expences and financial contraints would be a lovely. If I didn't win I would still be happy with my cheaper more affordable watch from Argos.With the chance of winning a tour of The Wing or attending a Watchmaking Masterclass that would be a bonus in learning more about the company.So @Koozie and @greenteacups if someone won the top prize, who didn't contribute to this forum, this post and got their answers from this forum or any other site where the answers can be found, and you didn't, but instead you won one of the other prizes on offer, would you be happy with that or would you still complain.Obviously you are both here for a reason, and that reason is most probably because you could not answer one of the questions, which one of the other forum members could. The whole idea of this forum is to help each other and thank others for their help, especially if you win.Good luck with the competition and hope to see you posting what you have won in the "I won" section, (https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/categories/i-won-i-won-i-won), thanking those members from this thread who supplied the answers to the questions you were stuck on.
Posting is a privilege, not a right. This is a privately-owned site. Posting is a privilege, not a right. Any inappropriate posts or any issues that take up a disproportionate amount of resources or make it a worse place to be will be stopped at our discretion - with or without explanation. No one pays to use this site; when there are issues, we pay to resolve them. Sometimes we need to prioritise spending money on the site, other issues or better resources.Please be nice to all MoneySavers. That’s the forum motto. Remember, the prime aim is to help provide info and resources. If you don’t like someone, their situation, their question or feel they’re intruding on ‘your board’ then please bite the bullet and think of the bigger issue. A Guardian article once "doffed its cap" to this forum as being the one place where consumers can collect together and fight back. Our job is to help keep it that way.Facebook = FB | Twitter/X = TW/X | Instagram = IG | Threads = THS | Snapchat = SC
Rafflecopter = RC | Gleam = GL | LinkedIn = LI | TikTok = TT | YouTube = YT
Pinterest = PIN | Twitch = TWH | Discord = DIS | Viral Sweep = VS | Sweep Widget = SW
Raffle site = RS
15 -
Comping_Rich said:greenteacups said:Koozie said:greenteacups said:Koozie said:andrew_g_scott said:Koozie said:Does anyone realize there is only ONE watch to win? If you keep posting answers, you are only hurting the rest of us! You are creating a larger pool of contestants with every answer you post. You should all be disqualified.
The simple fact is that Bremont have messed up here. This competition is ridiculous and a marketing failure. By making the competition unbelievably difficult and arguably no fun in the slightest, they are completely alienating fans and instead appealing to a very select group of individuals who simply like to enter competitions for fun, have no connection to the Bremont brand and really couldn't care less about the watch or the prize being from Bremont as a company. It is simply the joy of winning.
Will Bremont win any more customers from this competition? No. Have they improved brand awareness substantially? No. Have they spent a big chunk of cash on making a bespoke comp mini-website for very little gain? Absolutely.
Competitions (for a marketing gain) should appeal to a mass-audience and be fun and engaging. This is neither.Koozie said:greenteacups said:Koozie said:andrew_g_scott said:Koozie said:Does anyone realize there is only ONE watch to win? If you keep posting answers, you are only hurting the rest of us! You are creating a larger pool of contestants with every answer you post. You should all be disqualified.
The simple fact is that Bremont have messed up here. This competition is ridiculous and a marketing failure. By making the competition unbelievably difficult and arguably no fun in the slightest, they are completely alienating fans and instead appealing to a very select group of individuals who simply like to enter competitions for fun, have no connection to the Bremont brand and really couldn't care less about the watch or the prize being from Bremont as a company. It is simply the joy of winning.
Will Bremont win any more customers from this competition? No. Have they improved brand awareness substantially? No. Have they spent a big chunk of cash on making a bespoke comp mini-website for very little gain? Absolutely.
Competitions (for a marketing gain) should appeal to a mass-audience and be fun and engaging. This is neither.Since coming across the competition I have become a fan of Bremont and have learnt so much about the company along the way, following their socials etc. To be able to win a quality watch, which I would not be able to ordinerally afford or justify the cost due to other more important expences and financial contraints would be a lovely. If I didn't win I would still be happy with my cheaper more affordable watch from Argos.With the chance of winning a tour of The Wing or attending a Watchmaking Masterclass that would be a bonus in learning more about the company.So @Koozie and @greenteacups if someone won the top prize, who didn't contribute to this forum, this post and got their answers from this forum or any other site where the answers can be found, and you didn't, but instead you won one of the other prizes on offer, would you be happy with that or would you still complain.Obviously you are both here for a reason, and that reason is most probably because you could not answer one of the questions, which one of the other forum members could. The whole idea of this forum is to help each other and thank others for their help, especially if you win.Good luck with the competition and hope to see you posting what you have won in the "I won" section, (https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/categories/i-won-i-won-i-won), thanking those members from this thread who supplied the answers to the questions you were stuck on.4 -
Maybe a discussion on the morals and merits of contributing and sharing to win prizes and/or restricting winners to entitled elites should be better done on the Compers Chat Corner Forum? Should we start a thread?4
-
Link copied overBlessed on 18th February 2014 at 0814 with little Sarah xxx5
-
The Bremont codebreaker competition has been challenging, in fact as one who has entered some previous competitions, the questions on this have been some of the hardest I have seen. To assist each other in the hope that one person wins is what it is all about. I am sure Bremont are not expecting many to crack the code.
4 -
https://www.bremont.com/pages/vault-room
Question 19 of 20
Alternative once, without the emergency room visit in your home country.
Posting is a privilege, not a right. This is a privately-owned site. Posting is a privilege, not a right. Any inappropriate posts or any issues that take up a disproportionate amount of resources or make it a worse place to be will be stopped at our discretion - with or without explanation. No one pays to use this site; when there are issues, we pay to resolve them. Sometimes we need to prioritise spending money on the site, other issues or better resources.Please be nice to all MoneySavers. That’s the forum motto. Remember, the prime aim is to help provide info and resources. If you don’t like someone, their situation, their question or feel they’re intruding on ‘your board’ then please bite the bullet and think of the bigger issue. A Guardian article once "doffed its cap" to this forum as being the one place where consumers can collect together and fight back. Our job is to help keep it that way.Facebook = FB | Twitter/X = TW/X | Instagram = IG | Threads = THS | Snapchat = SC
Rafflecopter = RC | Gleam = GL | LinkedIn = LI | TikTok = TT | YouTube = YT
Pinterest = PIN | Twitch = TWH | Discord = DIS | Viral Sweep = VS | Sweep Widget = SW
Raffle site = RS
2 -
I was thinking Native for this.Alt Er Native (without the ER and ALT)2
-
BraindeadBrian said:I was thinking Native for this.Alt Er Native (without the ER and ALT)2
-
Native is the home country reference I think
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards