We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Inheritance theft

Options
1235»

Comments

  • msb1234
    msb1234 Posts: 611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Ultimately, if the deceased had been honest and declared this money he would not have been defrauding the benefits agency out of goodness knows how much. And if that had been the case, there would have been very little money in his tins under the bed to leave to anyone!
  • TripleH
    TripleH Posts: 3,188 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Depending on when the pools win was, there are limited places old notes can be cashed.
    The bottom line is that whilst there was once cash from a pools win, its hard to evidence that it was there on your partner's father's death. It may have been spent in many ways and if frittered away, some people can get embarrassed admitting it was squandered.
    Unfortunately unless you can provide evidence it existed it might as well not have. Hearsay is sadly insufficient.
    Your partner can report the 'alleged' benefit fraud, they will loose their siblings but there is no guarantee that any enquiries could prove any wrongdoing either. If their relationship has broken down so much, they should cut their siblings out of their life and let extended family know the reason.
    May you find your sister soon Helli.
    Sleep well.
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,218 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ggtazzy said:
    This is the situation my partners father was disabled and claiming benefits

     Why did he keep it in cash in house because he could not have any more than £16,000 in his bank account. 
    I am no expert on benefits, but I thought the threshold for reducing entitlement is a sliding scale from £6k to £16k after which entitlement is zero.   Withdrawal just to keep below £16k will have made little difference for benefits.
  • sammyjammy
    sammyjammy Posts: 7,949 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Mrs_Z said:

    I have no idea how a joint account would be treated after one party dies in the absence of a will.


    From what I understand, a joint account would not be counted as part of an estate as it automatically goes/stays with the the other joint account owner if you die, ie: when death of a joint account holder occurs, the funds in the joint account will usually automatically pass to the surviving account holder by what is known as ‘survivorship’. This means that NONE of the money in the joint account will pass to the deceased account holder’s estate.

    How did the siblings even gain access to this account?  Was the bank notified of the death of the account holder?

    It may well be that doesn't mean DWP wouldn't have interest in it, 50% of the contents would have been considered his by DWP and would possibly have impacted benefits he received.
    "You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "
  • sammyjammy
    sammyjammy Posts: 7,949 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    ggtazzy said:
    This is the situation my partners father was disabled and claiming benefits

     Why did he keep it in cash in house because he could not have any more than £16,000 in his bank account. 
    I am no expert on benefits, but I thought the threshold for reducing entitlement is a sliding scale from £6k to £16k after which entitlement is zero.   Withdrawal just to keep below £16k will have made little difference for benefits.
    Its a bit more complicated and different for pensioners.
    "You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,004 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    ggtazzy said:
    This is the situation my partners father was disabled and claiming benefits

     Why did he keep it in cash in house because he could not have any more than £16,000 in his bank account. 
    I am no expert on benefits, but I thought the threshold for reducing entitlement is a sliding scale from £6k to £16k after which entitlement is zero.   Withdrawal just to keep below £16k will have made little difference for benefits.
    Its a bit more complicated and different for pensioners.

    Do we know if the deceased was a pensioner?

    I've skimmed back and I can't see any mention of ages.
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,218 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ggtazzy said:
    This is the situation my partners father was disabled and claiming benefits

     Why did he keep it in cash in house because he could not have any more than £16,000 in his bank account. 
    I am no expert on benefits, but I thought the threshold for reducing entitlement is a sliding scale from £6k to £16k after which entitlement is zero.   Withdrawal just to keep below £16k will have made little difference for benefits.
    Its a bit more complicated and different for pensioners.
    Yes, but the OP said:
    ggtazzy said:
    This is the situation my partners father was disabled and claiming benefits for over 40 years 
    There is no mention of age at death but I'd assumed at least some of that "over 40 years" was below state pension age.  For a male to accrue over 40 years beyond age 65 takes them to over 100 so I'd even say some of that "over 40 years" must have been while working age.
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,004 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Have you made any decisions yet?

    @ggtazzy


    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,531 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As your partner is clearly not going to speak to the siblings again, the I guess a suggestion would be to phone them up, let them know you can "prove" the other money existed in cash in the house, so unless they pay your partner the fair share of the inheritance and show some receipts for costs, then you will be contacting the DWP so that the entire estate will be clawed back due to the benefit fraud that took place.

    (your partner will probably then lose their £2000 too, but you did say they didn't care about the money...)

    Some people behave so badly when it comes to death and inheritance. 
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.