We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
mean test pension credit
Comments
-
Who are you to accuse someone who has modest savings by being careful as "smug"?0
-
arnoldy said:Who are you to accuse someone who has modest savings by being careful as "smug"?1
-
mei388 said:I am a pensioner, I strongly believe that the goverment mean test pension credit on saving income is extremely unjustified . It said " £1 a week income per £500 of savings above £10,000 " so if you have saving of £17000, saving income £14 per week £728 per year. Do they know that you will need annual saving interest of 4.3% to earn £728 saving income. 4.3% is far from the currant rate of £1.8% or may be 3% one year fixed, weekly income £200 or more, not qualify to claim pension credit. Full state pensions is just over £185.10/week, the currant cost of living criss and the likely approaching recession scenario, what can this little saving of £17000 can help an old age pensioner. not much I guess
On the other hand, According to an Open Democracy report in April, MPs had charged taxpayers £420,000 for energy bills on their second homes over three years. High earner can claim from the tax box without mean test without limits, how can it be justify?
I am very disappointed indeed!2 -
[Deleted User] said:Flugelhorn said:[Deleted User] said:There has to be a limit somewhere. Be grateful you have savings, many do not.
Why do those with secure inflation-linked, public sector DB pensions (that's you, isn't it?) think it's OK to criticise the sacrifices made by those with with less secure pension arrangements, who need to manage the risks that they face in retirement? (rhetorical).
Childless? Yes, that's you, isn't it? No surprises that you don't understand the motives of those who have direct heirs.
Still ad hoc working (teaching) post retirement to build extra pension and earn more? Yes, that's you, isn't it? Why then criticise those who lack cushtie public sector pensions choosing to OMY pre-retiring?
Oh... and tax 'evasion' is illegal. Tax avoidance OTOH is both legal and sensible.
3 -
DairyQueen said:[Deleted User] said:Flugelhorn said:[Deleted User] said:There has to be a limit somewhere. Be grateful you have savings, many do not.
Why do those with secure inflation-linked, public sector DB pensions (that's you, isn't it?) think it's OK to criticise the sacrifices made by those with with less secure pension arrangements, who need to manage the risks that they face in retirement? (rhetorical).
Childless? Yes, that's you, isn't it? No surprises that you don't understand the motives of those who have direct heirs.
Still ad hoc working (teaching) post retirement to build extra pension and earn more? Yes, that's you, isn't it? Why then criticise those who lack cushtie public sector pensions choosing to OMY pre-retiring?
Oh... and tax 'evasion' is illegal. Tax avoidance OTOH is both legal and sensible.2 -
arnoldy said:Get 1p under the means testing pension limit and the door opens to a treasure trove of benefits and freebies, for example no TV licence, access to all sorts of heating benefits and schemes, council tax £thousands off.....
You really are worse of if you are just over the limit, very unfair and a disincentive for saving and doing the right thing if you are better off casting yourself on the state. How can this possibly be right?
If I was half as smart as I think I am - I'd be twice as smart as I REALLY am.0 -
Jealousy is terrible thing! I worked very hard for 40 years in my job often in very challenging circumstances. How dare you criticise my pension arrangements. I am furious at these comments. I undertook my career from a sense of vocation. I never even considered the pension scheme at the time. I just wanted to do my best to help as many people as possible achieve their potential. Interestingly, I was the only one of my group of university friends who went to university. They have all earned 3 to 10 times per annum my highest ever salary. Do I mind? Absolutely not! Why, because I was doing what I loved. Most of them have DC pensions and have retirement incomes far in excess of mine. It is not my fault that your pension arrangements are insecure.
If your only solution is to drag down others and blame them for your woes what sad people you are.4 -
Nobody queried how hard you worked, or that you did it all out of a sense of vocation, and for sure nobody said you don't deserve your pension/ good retirement.
Just that comments like this in bold can grate a bit, as it is easy to say, when you do not need the savings, and the taxpayer is guaranteeing your inflation linked pension.
I find myself increasingly at odds with the philosophy of some of the boards and threads on MSE that champion building wealth, tax evasion, saving and leaving loads for the family above all else. Plus of course work another year to make that pot a little bigger. When I look back on my life I have more regrets about the things I haven’t done or the risks that I didn’t take rather then having a few savings in the bank !
1 -
DairyQueen said:[Deleted User] said:Flugelhorn said:[Deleted User] said:There has to be a limit somewhere. Be grateful you have savings, many do not.
Why do those with secure inflation-linked, public sector DB pensions (that's you, isn't it?) think it's OK to criticise the sacrifices made by those with with less secure pension arrangements, who need to manage the risks that they face in retirement? (rhetorical).
Childless? Yes, that's you, isn't it? No surprises that you don't understand the motives of those who have direct heirs.
Still ad hoc working (teaching) post retirement to build extra pension and earn more? Yes, that's you, isn't it? Why then criticise those who lack cushtie public sector pensions choosing to OMY pre-retiring?
Oh... and tax 'evasion' is illegal. Tax avoidance OTOH is both legal and sensible.
I continue to work part-time as I enjoy the work and post pandemic there is chronic shortage of teaching staff in some areas. Without my input some students would not have been able to take their GCSE in my subject.
I am no longer paying into the pension scheme and even if I was, why should you be so angry about it?
You also seem angry that I am 'childless'. Rather a thoughtless comment as you may not be aware of my circumstances. How do you know that I have not lost children?
I think you need to calm down and take care when making comments that are potentially upsetting for others.
You have also misunderstood the gist of my original post. I was merely making the point that I personally wish I had taken more risks and regret not doing so. I realise that life experiences are more important than having savings in the bank. I have no problem with people that do.
Finally, I am entitled to have the view that people should not feel obliged to leave something for their heirs (Who do not necessarily have to be their children). Especially if it means that they themselves miss out on life's pleasures and comforts in their own retirements.0 -
DairyQueen said:There is an easy solution.... unsubscribe.
Why should I unsubscribe just because I have a different opinion and outlook.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards