📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Long Haul Flight - WiFi & VPN

Options
2»

Comments

  • onomatopoeia99
    onomatopoeia99 Posts: 7,160 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 August 2022 at 8:51PM


    Even better it allows the Wireguard protocol which is more secure than OpenVPN, lower processor overhead to save battery on portable devices.
    More secure?  I know wireguard is lower overhead, but more secure is not something I've heard.

    Not that I use VPN services where I don't control the endpoint.

    edit - even Proton VPN which uses Wireguard acknowledges the security of openVPN https://protonvpn.com/blog/openvpn-vs-wireguard/
    Proud member of the wokerati, though I don't eat tofu.Home is where my books are.Solar PV 5.2kWp system, SE facing, >1% shading, installed March 2019.Mortgage free July 2023


  • Even better it allows the Wireguard protocol which is more secure than OpenVPN, lower processor overhead to save battery on portable devices.
    More secure?  I know wireguard is lower overhead, but more secure is not something I've heard.

    Not that I use VPN services where I don't control the endpoint.

    edit - even Proton VPN which uses Wireguard acknowledges the security of openVPN https://protonvpn.com/blog/openvpn-vs-wireguard/
    So both are very secure and there isn't any historic vulnerabilities in either protocol that are concerning but:

    1. Auditability - Wireguard consist of just 4,000 lines of code vs 70,000 for OpenVPN. When it comes to auditing the code, Wireguard is much easier, one person could practically do that in a reasonable time period.

    2. Attack surface - as above, 70,000 lines of code are statistically more likely to contain a bug or vulnerability than 4,000 lines of code.

    3. Protocols - OpenVPN tries to be everything to everyone and is very compatible but allows downgrades to older and less secure protocols. Wireguard is more selective and uses a small subset of higher security protocols.

    4. Related to the above, Wireguard intentionally lacks protocol agility, if vulnerabilities are found, all endpoints are required to upgrade to the latest version and will reject any attempt to connect with vulnerable code.
    The security differences are subtle and probably of no relevance to most users, but the faster lower overhead code base is hard to ignore on portable devices.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    The less is more conundrum

    Well crafted code can be concise but not everyone is good at it

    Too many bug fixes on software add code rather's than fixing the code that was designed wrong in the first place.
  • Back to the thread, wouldn't it be likely that some or all access via VPN be blocked on the plane in an effort to preserve the connection bandwidth for others?

    If too many passengers started streaming some HD movies the service could grind to a halt.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.