We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CoP and the £1 test deposit
Comments
-
I have always named the payee for my own accounts what I want it to be. Chase savings, First Direct RS or whatever and just disregard the CoP warnings. It's never been disallowed for me. Otherwise my payee lists, statements etc would be unusable as above. I do have some accounts where I haven't added a new payee for years so maybe I'll hit a bump in the road sometime but I'll cross that bridge if I come to it
2 -
ColdIron said:I have always named the payee for my own accounts what I want it to be. Chase savings, First Direct RS or whatever and just disregard the CoP warnings. It's never been disallowed for me. Otherwise my payee lists, statements etc would be unusable as above. I do have some accounts where I haven't added a new payee for years so maybe I'll hit a bump in the road sometime but I'll cross that bridge if I come to it
Obviously, CoP fails if I don't match my name, but I can still use a personal naming convention if I choose to do so.0 -
RG2015 said:ColdIron said:I have always named the payee for my own accounts what I want it to be. Chase savings, First Direct RS or whatever and just disregard the CoP warnings. It's never been disallowed for me. Otherwise my payee lists, statements etc would be unusable as above. I do have some accounts where I haven't added a new payee for years so maybe I'll hit a bump in the road sometime but I'll cross that bridge if I come to it
Obviously, CoP fails if I don't match my name, but I can still use a personal naming convention if I choose to do so.Yes and no. Yes, with Santander you can in theory set up personal payee names but:1 It restricts the names you can use. I've never found the rules for that as Santander doesn't publish them but certainly the number of characters is restricted and certain characters/character combinations are not accepted. However, you only find out after setting up the name.
2 Unlike the sensible "nickname" facility with Santander,
(a) only once you've made your first payment will you find out if Santander has altered the payee name.
(b) Secondly (unlike nickname), having made a payment you can never change your chosen payee name without totally deleting the payee and setting it up again from scratch.
3 As you have already indicated that, since CoP will always fail to validate if you enter your personal name, you have to go back to using the £1 initial payment pantomime to validate your payee.So the Santander implementation of CoP is extremely poor for those of us who wish to have an optional nickname facility. It certainly takes me back to being obliged using the pre-CoP method for setting up payees.Reginald Molehusband0 -
Molehusband said:RG2015 said:ColdIron said:I have always named the payee for my own accounts what I want it to be. Chase savings, First Direct RS or whatever and just disregard the CoP warnings. It's never been disallowed for me. Otherwise my payee lists, statements etc would be unusable as above. I do have some accounts where I haven't added a new payee for years so maybe I'll hit a bump in the road sometime but I'll cross that bridge if I come to it
Obviously, CoP fails if I don't match my name, but I can still use a personal naming convention if I choose to do so.Yes and no. Yes, with Santander you can in theory set up personal payee names but:1 It restricts the names you can use. I've never found the rules for that as Santander doesn't publish them but certainly the number of characters is restricted and certain characters/character combinations are not accepted. However, you only find out after setting up the name.
2 Unlike the sensible "nickname" facility with Santander,
(a) only once you've made your first payment will you find out if Santander has altered the payee name.
(b) Secondly (unlike nickname), having made a payment you can never change your chosen payee name without totally deleting the payee and setting it up again from scratch.
3 As you have already indicated that, since CoP will always fail to validate if you enter your personal name, you have to go back to using the £1 initial payment pantomime to validate your payee.So the Santander implementation of CoP is extremely poor for those of us who wish to have an optional nickname facility. It certainly takes me back to being obliged using the pre-CoP method for setting up payees.0 -
Molehusband said:RG2015 said:ColdIron said:I have always named the payee for my own accounts what I want it to be. Chase savings, First Direct RS or whatever and just disregard the CoP warnings. It's never been disallowed for me. Otherwise my payee lists, statements etc would be unusable as above. I do have some accounts where I haven't added a new payee for years so maybe I'll hit a bump in the road sometime but I'll cross that bridge if I come to it
Obviously, CoP fails if I don't match my name, but I can still use a personal naming convention if I choose to do so.Yes and no. Yes, with Santander you can in theory set up personal payee names but:1 It restricts the names you can use. I've never found the rules for that as Santander doesn't publish them but certainly the number of characters is restricted and certain characters/character combinations are not accepted. However, you only find out after setting up the name.
2 Unlike the sensible "nickname" facility with Santander,
(a) only once you've made your first payment will you find out if Santander has altered the payee name.
(b) Secondly (unlike nickname), having made a payment you can never change your chosen payee name without totally deleting the payee and setting it up again from scratch.
3 As you have already indicated that, since CoP will always fail to validate if you enter your personal name, you have to go back to using the £1 initial payment pantomime to validate your payee.So the Santander implementation of CoP is extremely poor for those of us who wish to have an optional nickname facility. It certainly takes me back to being obliged using the pre-CoP method for setting up payees.
Santander's CoP doesn't always fail - if you enter the correct, or nearly correct, name of the account holder, you get it confirmed (provided the target bank actually participates in CoP). If you wish, you can then immediately go back and change the payee name to one you prefer, repeat the CoP check, which will obviously now fail, but you can accept it anyway. I think this "trick" works with all banks who offer CoP, and saves you from the £1 malarkey.
5 -
Daliah said:Molehusband said:RG2015 said:ColdIron said:I have always named the payee for my own accounts what I want it to be. Chase savings, First Direct RS or whatever and just disregard the CoP warnings. It's never been disallowed for me. Otherwise my payee lists, statements etc would be unusable as above. I do have some accounts where I haven't added a new payee for years so maybe I'll hit a bump in the road sometime but I'll cross that bridge if I come to it
Obviously, CoP fails if I don't match my name, but I can still use a personal naming convention if I choose to do so.Yes and no. Yes, with Santander you can in theory set up personal payee names but:1 It restricts the names you can use. I've never found the rules for that as Santander doesn't publish them but certainly the number of characters is restricted and certain characters/character combinations are not accepted. However, you only find out after setting up the name.
2 Unlike the sensible "nickname" facility with Santander,
(a) only once you've made your first payment will you find out if Santander has altered the payee name.
(b) Secondly (unlike nickname), having made a payment you can never change your chosen payee name without totally deleting the payee and setting it up again from scratch.
3 As you have already indicated that, since CoP will always fail to validate if you enter your personal name, you have to go back to using the £1 initial payment pantomime to validate your payee.So the Santander implementation of CoP is extremely poor for those of us who wish to have an optional nickname facility. It certainly takes me back to being obliged using the pre-CoP method for setting up payees.
Santander's CoP doesn't always fail - if you enter the correct, or nearly correct, name of the account holder, you get it confirmed (provided the target bank actually participates in CoP). If you wish, you can then immediately go back and change the payee name to one you prefer, repeat the CoP check, which will obviously now fail, but you can accept it anyway. I think this "trick" works with all banks who offer CoP, and saves you from the £1 malarkey.I have been using the Santander payment system for decades before CoP was ever thought about. As I said earlier Santander do not publish restrictions to what you can use for Payee Name. I have discovered the hard way that they restrict both the total length of the Payee name field, the number of words you can use in the field and many special characters are not available. I cannot give you the specific rules as it would take me weeks (or months) to try every conceivable character combination. However Santander never generates an error message and you only find out these name restrictions after you have made the first payment. And I repeat what I said earlier that (unlike nicknames) you cannot change the Payee name field later without starting the Payee setup again.As regards the CoP validation itself, I never bother to use it with Santander as I'm so used to the £1 pantomime going back many decades. Until Santander get off their backsides and implement the optional nickname field, the Santander £1 pantomime will continue for me.Reginald Molehusband0 -
Molehusband said:As regards the CoP validation itself, I never bother to use it with Santander as I'm so used to the £1 pantomime going back many decades. Until Santander get off their backsides and implement the optional nickname field, the Santander £1 pantomime will continue for me.1
-
Daliah said:Molehusband said:As regards the CoP validation itself, I never bother to use it with Santander as I'm so used to the £1 pantomime going back many decades. Until Santander get off their backsides and implement the optional nickname field, the Santander £1 pantomime will continue for me.
Reginald Molehusband0 -
Molehusband said:Daliah said:Molehusband said:As regards the CoP validation itself, I never bother to use it with Santander as I'm so used to the £1 pantomime going back many decades. Until Santander get off their backsides and implement the optional nickname field, the Santander £1 pantomime will continue for me.
0 -
Molehusband said:RG2015 said:This is interesting. The problem is not with CoP then, but with Santander and the absence of the “nickname” facility.
I have no such problem with NatWest being my main hub, and naming my accounts according to my convention.
I think it would be helpful if the Payment Systems Regulator would make these layabouts implement the optional "Nickname" field.Retired at age 56 after having "light bulb moment" due to reading MSE and its forums. Have been converted to the "budget to zero" concept and use YNAB for all monthly budgeting and long term goals.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards