We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

To Leave it or Lump it?

If in very fortunate position not to need the lump sum from private DB pension would it be better just to leave it and have increased annual pension? Lump sum is around 110k v around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. Age 65, no dependants, decent health.
«1

Comments

  • Is £6k post tax or would you really only be getting £4.8k (or even £3.6k) after tax?

    Either way would you expect to be able to get the same return from £110k with no risk?
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 31,259 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. 

    Do you mean increasing with CPI with no cap ? and even if CPI was less than 3% , you would still get a minimum 3%.

    If so that is better than the usual deal and considering the commutation rate is around 18, which is not that great , it would point to not taking the lump sum.

  • Tiki30
    Tiki30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Would be £4.8k after tax.  The lump sum would just be in best fixed rate savings accounts I could find.
    Happy with current investment risks and not looking to put this money at investment risk. Inflation  risks are already a concern but hopefully shorter term in pension context.
  • Tiki30
    Tiki30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. 

    Do you mean increasing with CPI with no cap ? and even if CPI was less than 3% , you would still get a minimum 3%.

    If so that is better than the usual deal and considering the commutation rate is around 18, which is not that great , it would point to not taking the lump sum.

    Says by the lower of increase in CPI or 3% each year.
  • Tiki30
    Tiki30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Sorry, pension accrued after 2005 that went down to 2.5%. (Started 1991)
  • Tiki30
    Tiki30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Sorry can't see how to edit my posts here but another correction. Lump sum figure was last year so should be around £118k at time of accessing later this year.
  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 5,301 Ambassador
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 3 June 2022 at 11:42AM
    Tiki30 said:
    around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. 

    Do you mean increasing with CPI with no cap ? and even if CPI was less than 3% , you would still get a minimum 3%.

    If so that is better than the usual deal and considering the commutation rate is around 18, which is not that great , it would point to not taking the lump sum.

    Says by the lower of increase in CPI or 3% each year.

    So it's CPI inflation, capped at 3%.
    Your guaranteed return by taking the extra pension is 4.36%, inflation linked (with 3% cap). Unless you have a specific use for the £110,000 I would take the extra pension. Makes no sense to put it in a fixed rate interest account earning 2% with no protection against inflation.
    Do you have other cash savings / emergency funds to fall back on if required?
    I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.
    Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,297 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Tiki30 said:
    If in very fortunate position not to need the lump sum from private DB pension would it be better just to leave it and have increased annual pension? Lump sum is around 110k v around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. Age 65, no dependants, decent health.
    Which fits best with your wider circumstances?  Decisions like these may have one method better than the other on paper but when you factor in circumstances it could sway it the other way.

    You don't need the lump sum now but what about later? 
    Is there a spouse/partner whose retirement planning is not as good as yours? (you could use excess lump sum to improve their provision  - although you could also potentially use the income to feed their provision but risk of early death)
    What is your income tax position throughout retirement?


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Tiki30
    Tiki30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    NedS said:
    Tiki30 said:
    around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. 

    Do you mean increasing with CPI with no cap ? r guaranteed return by taking the extra pension is 4.36%, inflation linked (with 3% cap). Unless you have a specific use for the £110,000 I would take the extra pension. Makes no sense to put it in a fixed rate interest account earning 2% with no protection against inflation.

    Do you have other cash savings / emergency funds to fall back on if required?
    It's capped at 2.5% it seems. 
    I have more than sufficient to fall back on thankfully.
  • Tiki30
    Tiki30 Posts: 33 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    dunstonh said:
    Tiki30 said:
    If in very fortunate position not to need the lump sum from private DB pension would it be better just to leave it and have increased annual pension? Lump sum is around 110k v around 6k annually increasing with CPI or 3%. Age 65, no dependants, decent health.
    Which fits best with your wider circumstances?  Decisions like these may have one method better than the other on paper but when you factor in circumstances it could sway it the other way.

    You don't need the lump sum now but what about later? 
    Is there a spouse/partner whose retirement planning is not as good as yours? (you could use excess lump sum to improve their provision  - although you could also potentially use the income to feed their provision but risk of early death)
    What is your income tax position throughout retirement?


    Unlikely to need later but of course never say never, can only make decisions based on what I think right now.
    No mortgage or debts and just me myself and I to think about in terms of my finances.

    I expect my income tax position to be maintained at basic rate.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.