We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Current Price Cap (as of April 2022)
Options
![[Deleted User]](https://us-noi.v-cdn.net/6031891/uploads/defaultavatar/nFA7H6UNOO0N5.jpg)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie

in Energy
The general consenus appears to be not to fix if the rate is 25% more than the current typical price cap of £1971 per year detailed in the latest MSE Newsletter of May 4.
(As a side note; the use of the word 'typical' is thrown around way too much nowadays - what really is typical?!)
Would it be reasonable to assume that you could apply the same principal to individual Units and Daily Standing Charge?
For example:
If the rate is 0.25p, then adding 25% on top would equal a total of 0.3125p (i.e., 0.25p plus 0.0625p).
So in principal, you should be looking at a tariff of roughly no more than 0.31 to 0.32p per unit?
0
Comments
-
Yes your example is correct. The standing charge of course needs checking as well as fixed rates can increase this as well as the kWh not being bound by the price cap.
If you know your yearly kWh usage and have an idea of what you think may happen with the price cap in October you are half way there to gambling on the energy market.
Place your bets please!1 -
Deleted_User said:So in principle, you should be looking at a tariff of roughly no more than 0.31 to 0.32p per unit?You need to get your pounds and pence sorted out !Whether it's the daily standing charge or the cost per kWh, it certainly won't be less than a penny.The answer is to compare the increase in the whole bill for your annual usage, based on actual meter readings. If you use 25,000kWh per year and the kWh price goes up 1% you won't care if the daily charge goes up by 50%.1
-
You should also always consider for how long a fix is. The 25% for a 12 months fix is very different to 25% for a 24 months fix.
Also the exit fee is something to consider.1 -
Gerry1 said:Deleted_User said:So in principle, you should be looking at a tariff of roughly no more than 0.31 to 0.32p per unit?You need to get your pounds and pence sorted out !Whether it's the daily standing charge or the cost per kWh, it certainly won't be less than a penny.The answer is to compare the increase in the whole bill for your annual usage, based on actual meter readings. If you use 25,000kWh per year and the kWh price goes up 1% you won't care if the daily charge goes up by 50%.Just because Energy Suppliers decide to show pence with two or three decimal places (i.e., 31.12p or 31.123p) does not make my example any different - 31.12p is still the same as 0.31p in nomal everyday pounds and pence!0
-
pochase said:You should also always consider for how long a fix is. The 25% for a 12 months fix is very different to 25% for a 24 months fix.
Also the exit fee is something to consider.
Certainly worth considering, but not sure if anyone would really want to fix for 24 months in this day and age0 -
Deleted_User said:Just because Energy Suppliers decide to show pence with two or three decimal places (i.e., 31.12p or 31.123p) does not make my example any different - 31.12p is still the same as 0.31p in nomal everyday pounds and pence!Just being pedantic, but Gerry isn't wrong...31.12p = £0.3112. or £0.31 when rounded ... 0.31p or 0.3112p is 100 times smaller than the first two...
3 -
MWT said:Deleted_User said:Just because Energy Suppliers decide to show pence with two or three decimal places (i.e., 31.12p or 31.123p) does not make my example any different - 31.12p is still the same as 0.31p in nomal everyday pounds and pence!Just being pedantic, but Gerry isn't wrong...31.12p = £0.3112. or £0.31 when rounded ... 0.31p or 0.3112p is 100 times smaller than the first two...
0.31p is just under 1/3rd of 1p
It is not 31p (£0.31)4 -
Deleted_User said:pochase said:You should also always consider for how long a fix is. The 25% for a 12 months fix is very different to 25% for a 24 months fix.
Also the exit fee is something to consider.
Certainly worth considering, but not sure if anyone would really want to fix for 24 months in this day and ageI took on a 2 year fix last September. I'm already on unbeatable rates and there's no exit fee should things miraculously turn around.Not sure if I'd take one now though.Edit:The "principle" in your OP of applying x% to the standing charge and rate doesn't reflect reality. The April increase on one account I manage was 87% on electricity SC and 37% on the rate, then 4% on the gas SC and 85% on its rate.Look at the total annual cost for the amount of energy you use and compare that between fixes and current rates. Longer fixes and exit fees (which seem to be getting bigger) make it all the more difficult to compare and increase the gamble you'd be taking.I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the In My Home MoneySaving, Energy and Techie Stuff boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.
All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
1 -
k_man said:That's being not pedantic, it is been accurate.Only to the extent that I understood what was intended, but yes, it was entirely inaccurate to present it that way.Much the same as the kW vs kWh mistakes that occur with great regularity.They are, unfortunately two very different things, but I can usually work out which is intended from the context, so I don't try to correct them in every case any more than I try to correct spelling errors and typos 'been' vs 'being' for example
2 -
MWT said:k_man said:That's being not pedantic, it is been accurate.Only to the extent that I understood what was intended, but yes, it was entirely inaccurate to present it that way.Much the same as the kW vs kWh mistakes that occur with great regularity.They are, unfortunately two very different things, but I can usually work out which is intended from the context, so I don't try to correct them in every case any more than I try to correct spelling errors and typos 'been' vs 'being' for example0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards