We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Vendor only willing to pay for part of remedial work
Comments
-
Even as an FTB surely you would have known that a 70s house would need updating, however you chose to pay over the market value and now you want the vendor to pay for things you'll benefit from. This is why FTBs get a bad reputation.ESMForum said:Hi GoogleMeNow, thank you for your reply!
To answer your questions, the house was built in the 70s so I probably should have expected some minor issues with the wiring to be fair. but I'm a FTB so it didn't appear obvious to me when I viewed the property. My surveyor later found issues with the wiring and boiler and recommended a renegotiation as my offer was above market value, but the vendor has refused to reduce the price so as compromises they agreed to carry out electrical and gas safety checks.
I guess insisting they pay for the work probably isn't a good idea now that I think about it, but I'm genuinely a bit confused about what would be a 'fair price' for this type of thing.
If the boiler works fine why should the vendor contribute! The electrics are dated but as the vendor lives in the property currently look to work fine its just you want more sockets etc.
I cant even believe the vendor paid for the survey's, think you lucked out there as it would have been a straight pay for your own due diligence.6 -
As others have said, you don't need to do this work, as clearly the vendor has been living with the electrics and boiler. Both of those things wear out eventually and so the fact that an update would be nice is probably not the fault of your seller, it's to be expected in a house of that age. Therefore any work you do will be for your benefit and you should probably pay or live with it.
However rewiring is horribly disruptive and messy and so if you can stretch to doing it before you move in (if you're a FTB, I'm assuming you're in rented so do not need to move on completion day) that would save you a lot of hassle later. Get more sockets put in than you could imagine needing.3 -
I'm wih everyone else. Think yourself lucky the vendor paid for the electrical test, and if you get a copy, that's a bonus.Boiler is old but working. So is mine, but I ain't replacing it!Electrics are old but working (almost certainly) so upgrading is perhaps nice to do for your new home, but not a necessity, unless the report actually identifies dangers (as opposed to 'issues' which probably means not compliant with current Regs, just like 90% of UK houses).3
-
You're having a laugh, surely? Your report says that the boiler is functioning and will need replaced at some point, and you think your seller should stump up cash towards its replacement?!1
-
A lesson learnt perhaps for the future. Don't pay over the odds.ESMForum said:recommended a renegotiation as my offer was above market value,1 -
I am sure if the boiler stopped working and packed up the Vendor would have it fixed or replaced however it is working and I would agree with the vendor why replace something if its not broken.
Same with the electrics ! Maybe not enough sockets but the people living in the property have managed for X number of years.
If the electrics tripped every time you turned on the lights or put the kettle on you would get it fixed.
Now I have rewired a couple of houses and it causes one hell of a mess.
Floor boards up, Replastering after installing new sockets in different parts of the rooms, New RCB fusebox in metal.
New carpets, New painting and decoration
If you want to rewire the house and fit a new boiler well that is your decision and you get to decide where and how many plugs,
What kind of new boiler etc3 -
As previous, why on earth are you expecting the vendor to pay to update the electrics in the house? You’ve viewed it, offered on and should expect to pay what you’ve offered.
Please stop wasting the vendor’s time.2006 LBM £28,000+ in debt.
2021 mortgage and debt free, working part time and living the dream0 -
There's very few 'perfect' houses out there that are going to have no issues in surveys/electrical/gas checks...you just need to either accept that and get the work done yourself and proceed with the purchase, or pull out. But then any other house you look at is probably going to have some issues with it as well if you look hard enough. Fact is, it's a sellers market so the vendor is most likely not going to care that much if you do pull out of it since there's probably someone else willing to take it off his hands.0
-
The boiler was there when you viewed and the electrics were as is when you viewed. As long as the boiler is working and electrics working no one needs to change anything. You need to have an emergency fund to deal with boiler when it finally packs up. It’s not really reasons enough to reduce price.ESMForum said:
I probably would still stick with it as I'm quite happy with the property, but considering its boiler will need replacing too I'm looking at £5k+ just for remedial work alone...theoretica said:If they will not pay for the entire work are you happy to walk away from the purchase?Initial mortgage bal £487.5k, current £238k, target £122k (quarter way!)
Mortgage start date first week of July 2019,
Mortgage term 23yrs(end of June 2042🙇🏽♀️),Target is to pay it off in 10years(by 2030🥳).MFW#10 (2022/23 mfw#34)(2021 mfw#47)(2020 mfw#136)
£12K in 2021 #54 (in 2020 #148)
MFiT-T6#27
To save £100K in 48months start 01/07/2020 Achieved 30/05/2023 👯♀️
To save £100k in 60months start 01/01/2027
Am a single mom of 4.Do not wait to buy a property, Buy a property and wait. 🤓3 -
You chose to offer above market value attracting the vendor to accept your offer, as a first time buyer. In a property as much as 50 years old without new electrics and a newish boiler, I would have assumed there would be additional costs. I would have been of the attitude that if survey returned with under 5k of issues that would not be a surprise and i would probably not renegotiate. I would use the money i had set aside for such assumed problems - 10k. This is how i approached my purchase. Bidding high, then revising offer based on survey and factors within anticipation, is a messy approach.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


