We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Would a small home battery system (2kwh), without any solar, help with household energy bill crisis

Options
12346»

Comments

  • markin
    markin Posts: 3,860 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 5 April 2022 at 8:30AM
    Scotland im sure will be boasting of being 100% wind this night, 31/3
     

    Still no cheap power on octopus agile tarrif.


  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sea_Shell said:
    Maybe we all need to rig up a static bike* to a dynamo...we could get fit whilst powering the TV 😉

    But then think how many calories we'd need to consume to provide us with the energy to power the bike...so we'd need to buy more pasta.

    Cost benefit analysis anyone? 😉



    *Other human powered machines are available
    There was a programme on the TV some years back. Where a home was powered by cyclists. Even boiling a kettle required a huge amount of people power. A non starter. 
  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 9,798 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    MWT said:
    PGammage said:
    Dolor said:
    Worth remembering that it is not just the kWh size of a battery that matters but also the kW output. Even with a Powerwall 2, the battery alone cannot sustain an electric oven when it is heating, and a 3kW kettle.
    Fully understand that, this is not a put going off grid, it's about redistribution of the off-peak capacity to supplement peak.
    First you need to have excess off-peak capacity, and right now, we don't.
    As per the post earlier, we are currently burning gas to supply the overnight demand, hence the lack of low cost electricity at night.


    Is that true nationally, off peak demand exceeds any capacity ?
    The problem is with not enough cheap spare generating capacity in the off-peak, available reliably 365 days a year (that's the niche that coal once filled).

    We could burn more gas off-peak, but generating expensive electricity to sell cheaply - as a tool to help people who've invested in batteries deal with the "household energy bill crisis" - isn't likely to bring bills down for everyone else.  And hence not a very popular or effective policy.
  • victor2
    victor2 Posts: 8,132 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Section62 said:
    MWT said:
    PGammage said:
    Dolor said:
    Worth remembering that it is not just the kWh size of a battery that matters but also the kW output. Even with a Powerwall 2, the battery alone cannot sustain an electric oven when it is heating, and a 3kW kettle.
    Fully understand that, this is not a put going off grid, it's about redistribution of the off-peak capacity to supplement peak.
    First you need to have excess off-peak capacity, and right now, we don't.
    As per the post earlier, we are currently burning gas to supply the overnight demand, hence the lack of low cost electricity at night.


    Is that true nationally, off peak demand exceeds any capacity ?
    The problem is with not enough cheap spare generating capacity in the off-peak, available reliably 365 days a year (that's the niche that coal once filled).

    We could burn more gas off-peak, but generating expensive electricity to sell cheaply - as a tool to help people who've invested in batteries deal with the "household energy bill crisis" - isn't likely to bring bills down for everyone else.  And hence not a very popular or effective policy.
    And we've got the roll-out of electric vehicles requiring more "off-peak" electricity. Nuclear energy still looks like the best green (if you can call it that) way to meet the demand, but we haven't invested enough in that.

    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the In My Home MoneySaving, Energy and Techie Stuff boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. 

    All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

  • markin
    markin Posts: 3,860 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sea_Shell said:
    Maybe we all need to rig up a static bike* to a dynamo...we could get fit whilst powering the TV 😉

    But then think how many calories we'd need to consume to provide us with the energy to power the bike...so we'd need to buy more pasta.

    Cost benefit analysis anyone? 😉



    *Other human powered machines are available
    There was a programme on the TV some years back. Where a home was powered by cyclists. Even boiling a kettle required a huge amount of people power. A non starter. 
    Welcome to the Future, today.

  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 9,798 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    victor2 said:
    Section62 said:
    MWT said:
    PGammage said:
    Dolor said:
    Worth remembering that it is not just the kWh size of a battery that matters but also the kW output. Even with a Powerwall 2, the battery alone cannot sustain an electric oven when it is heating, and a 3kW kettle.
    Fully understand that, this is not a put going off grid, it's about redistribution of the off-peak capacity to supplement peak.
    First you need to have excess off-peak capacity, and right now, we don't.
    As per the post earlier, we are currently burning gas to supply the overnight demand, hence the lack of low cost electricity at night.


    Is that true nationally, off peak demand exceeds any capacity ?
    The problem is with not enough cheap spare generating capacity in the off-peak, available reliably 365 days a year (that's the niche that coal once filled).

    We could burn more gas off-peak, but generating expensive electricity to sell cheaply - as a tool to help people who've invested in batteries deal with the "household energy bill crisis" - isn't likely to bring bills down for everyone else.  And hence not a very popular or effective policy.
    And we've got the roll-out of electric vehicles* requiring more "off-peak" electricity. Nuclear energy still looks like the best green (if you can call it that) way to meet the demand, but we haven't invested enough in that.

    *And trains.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.