We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
What to do about the lodger?
Comments
-
The so called lodger has no contract or agreement so has no right to stay. They have no grounds to fight to stay and no recourse to the law to enable them to do so.Hand the keys to the HA and walk away. Leave them to deal with everything. You are under no obligation as long as the estate is insolvent and you do not intermeddle.3
-
HAs are very good at trying to pass the buck so they don't have to work for a living. OP does not have to do anything, no one has to deal with another person's estate, no debts or responsibilities are passed on. Only if there are major financial gains of doing so should they get involved. The only person who had any responsibility over the lodger and the house contents was the mother and as she is no longer around it is down to the property owner to deal with. HAs will have a team or contractor on call to clear houses, it is not an uncommon occurrence and seen on many fly on the wall TV documentary series.
2 -
No 'eviction' is necessary, as the lodger is not a tenant. They can be given minimal notice and removed using reasonable force.No free lunch, and no free laptop
0 -
What does ‘intermediate’ mean please?Newly_retired said:The so called lodger has no contract or agreement so has no right to stay. They have no grounds to fight to stay and no recourse to the law to enable them to do so.Hand the keys to the HA and walk away. Leave them to deal with everything. You are under no obligation as long as the estate is insolvent and you do not intermeddle.0 -
Sorry, I meant to say ‘intermeddle’. Damn spellcheck!0
-
It depends on which country you are in.macman said:No 'eviction' is necessary, as the lodger is not a tenant. They can be given minimal notice and removed using reasonable force.
In Scotland, where I live, forcing a lodger to leave their home is considered illegal eviction and is a criminal act.
In the absence of any other agreement the lodger (we call them 'common law tenants') must be given at least 40 days notice. Only if he doesn't leave at the end of the notice period can you start legal process in the Sheriff Court to force them to leave.
I think things are different in England and Wales?0 -
there is a bit of an explanation here https://www.nelsonslaw.co.uk/intermeddling/ basically means having statrtedf the work of an executor, there are some things that you are allowed to do without it considered to be intermeddling and they are also listedmsb1234 said:Sorry, I meant to say ‘intermeddle’. Damn spellcheck!0 -
Update: The "lodger" refused to leave, and is claiming to have the right to apply for the tenancy as "Personal Representative" of the MIL. We've informed the HA, and handed over the keys as requested.4
-
All you can do, under the circumstances.Choppit69 said:Update: The "lodger" refused to leave, and is claiming to have the right to apply for the tenancy as "Personal Representative" of the MIL. We've informed the HA, and handed over the keys as requested.Signature removed for peace of mind0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
