We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Money Moral Dilemma: I put in a much bigger deposit - but should we split the property equally?
Options
Comments
-
And thirdly, you need to be tenants in common for unequal shares which will make a will necessary0
-
When I bought a house with my partner he put in a larger deposit than I did. After considering various options (through something called "talking to each other" I know, radical, right?) we decided that I would pay a higher share of the monthly mortgage payment until things even out.
We also each left our share of the house to each other in our wills so that we didn't risk one of us being left homeless - and this is something you're going to need to consider too, regardless of how you split the house ownership. Even if you don't want your lesser contributing partner to be entitled to half the house if you split up, do you want to risk them being left homeless if you pass away unexpectedly?
This was influenced by the fact that he already owned property before we met, so was able to stump up for more deposit, but I had the higher salary of the two of us. If my salary or anything else about the situation changes significantly in the future, we will review, but so far it's worked well. We had also been together for over a decade at this point, so although nothing is guaranteed in life, we knew each other well enough to have a sense of how the other might behave in the event of a break-up
This thread is probably useful in the sense that it might give you some ideas for different ways to approach the situation, but ultimately you have to talk to each other and figure out a solution that you can both live with. If you can't manage that, then probably it's a bit too soon to be entering a major financial commitment together.1 -
I would usually say get a deed of trust that states you get your deposit back on sale. It's only sensible in an unmarried/no kids situation. In my experience partners say they don't care about money until you split then all of a sudden they want everything they can get.
However as I notice only one other person has asked the question what is the reason for the other person having a lower deposit? Are there children involved? If one partner has given up part of their career or earnings to do unpaid labour like childcare etc. then is it really fair to penalise them for not being able to afford a bigger deposit.
Once there are children you become a family and there is more to think about than just mine and yours.
Also as others have said why are people assuming the person with the larger deposit is female. I paid all of our deposit of £30k and my husband nothing. I earn more than him and I have plenty of friends in the same situation.0 -
You are being completely reasonable. Definitely put in place a tenants in common rather than joint tenants arrangement, where you can specify the percentage each one owns, rather than a 50/50 split. This could also protect your assets in the event of your death. Your conveyancy solicitor should advise you of the options. I did this with my (now ex) husband and protecting my assets allowed me then to be able to buy again when we had to sell the family home. If your partner is reluctant to do this and can’t see why it is important to you, then I would possibly question the longevity of the relationship and whether buying a house together is the right thing to do.0
-
Just no . First hand experience of a fall out (not mine) . Unless you have a lawyer for free it will cost you dearly to retrieve anything .0
-
I don’t think you should buy a house with anybody that there’s an even remote possibility you might split up from Personal0
-
teetkac said:No, I don't think you should split 50/50. You could do two things:1. Have an agreement drawn up that upon sale or split you get your 40% back and she gets her 5% and you could split the remainder 50/50. Or2. Split it proportionally right from the start you 67.5% and her 32.5% (see a comment further up for the math rather than writing it out again for you).Personally, I'd only split the whole property value 50/50 if you'd be willing to hand over your money if you split up.0
-
There's been a lot of good advice on here, but giving accurate advice is difficult with very little information. As seeroo mentioned, there could be other factors such as children. If you partner has less money due to raising your child(ren), it would be fairer to factor this in.
Ultimately, you need to communicate and maybe take separate advice and then find a solution that is mutually agreeable. There isn't a one-size-fits-all answer. On the limited information provided, a 60/40 split is quite generous.
In response to those saying you shouldn't buy a property with someone if there's even a tiny chance you could split up... unfortunately, we live in the real world. I highly doubt you intend or foresee you splitting up, but there is ALWAYS a possibility that it could happen. A relationship is never guaranteed.0 -
Make sure that the property is bought as tenants in common rather than joint tenants. Then draw up a Declaration of Trust to record your share and how any increase/decrease in value is to be apportioned. You can have the solicitor draw up paperwork so that the person how put more money into the property, gets a greater share if you split and have to sell. In law there is no such thing as a common-law husband/wife so if you aren’t married or in a civil partnership, your money in the property will go to your next of kin and not your partner, no matter how long you have been together or if you have children. It is important to have a Will drawn up to decide where your property or money will go if something were to happen to you. Solicitors will often draw up a Will for £50 so it’s worth protecting yourselves0
-
SuseOrm said:I don’t think you should buy a house with anybody that there’s an even remote possibility you might split up from Personal
Me and my partner aren't contributing an equal deposit but as others have mentioned, this will be taken into account in the percentages so I own slightly less. No issue from my behalf and if the worst does happen then its a fair split.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards