We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Buy Capital Gearing Trust?
Comments
-
Trojan X ironically is one of the best returns in my portfolio, there's only one other sitting at double digits. If you're looking at this area I'd certainly consider it0
-
The performance between Trojan X and PNL seems very similar.ChilliBob said:Trojan X ironically is one of the best returns in my portfolio, there's only one other sitting at double digits. If you're looking at this area I'd certainly consider it
Am I right in thinking there's an initial 5% charge for Trojan X? The OGC also seems a little higher.
1 -
Same manager, same style. No retail platform charges an initial fee these days
0 -
Thanks. Must be old info on iWeb re the initial charge.ColdIron said:Same manager, same style. No retail platform charges an initial fee these days
0 -
Yeah Iweb often have this charge nonsense, but it hardly if ever applies.
PNL basically is the Investment Trust equivalent of Trojan X really. So, depends what you like really and what platform you have. Obvs you get 0.5% stamp on the IT.2 -
Shame there's no open ended version of CGT. After all, 0.5% is 0.5%.0
-
Yes, but if you plan on holding it for any length of time, it becomes almost irrelevant. Especially if you hold on a platform such as HL which charges 0.45% per year for holding OEICs and caps the fees for ITs thus paying for itself in the first year. I would also argue that a closed end structure is more efficient as the manager isn't subject to inopportune inflows or outflows and can also take advantage of leveraging, if permitted by the board, to further enhance shareholder returns (or losses).aroominyork said:Shame there's no open ended version of CGT. After all, 0.5% is 0.5%.
Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter0 -
There's pros and cons to both structures, depends on your circumstances really. I hold both structures for different things and via different platforms. I do find the stamp duty harder to swallow with something which is likely to yield a lowish return (obviously with lower risk) as it represents a larger chunk of the returns. All academic in years gone by yes!0
-
I'm with Interactive Investor so pay a fixed fee.
I don't think CGT uses leveraging. It would be a curious thing for a wealth preservation fund to do since it adds risk.0 -
CG absolute return fund ?aroominyork said:Shame there's no open ended version of CGT. After all, 0.5% is 0.5%.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards