📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buy Capital Gearing Trust?

2456713

Comments

  • ChilliBob
    ChilliBob Posts: 2,340 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Trojan X ironically is one of the best returns in my portfolio, there's only one other sitting at double digits. If you're looking at this area I'd certainly consider it 
  • ChilliBob said:
    Trojan X ironically is one of the best returns in my portfolio, there's only one other sitting at double digits. If you're looking at this area I'd certainly consider it 
    The performance between Trojan X and PNL seems very similar.



    Am I right in thinking there's an initial 5% charge for Trojan X? The OGC also seems a little higher.


  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 9,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    Same manager, same style. No retail platform charges an initial fee these days
  • ColdIron said:
    Same manager, same style. No retail platform charges an initial fee these days
    Thanks. Must be old info on iWeb re the initial charge.

  • ChilliBob
    ChilliBob Posts: 2,340 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yeah Iweb often have this charge nonsense, but it hardly if ever applies. 

    PNL basically is the Investment Trust equivalent of Trojan X really. So, depends what you like really and what platform you have. Obvs you get 0.5% stamp on the IT. 
  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,361 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Shame there's no open ended version of CGT. After all, 0.5% is 0.5%.
  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 4,567 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Shame there's no open ended version of CGT. After all, 0.5% is 0.5%.
    Yes, but if you plan on holding it for any length of time, it becomes almost irrelevant. Especially if you hold on a platform such as HL which charges 0.45% per year for holding OEICs and caps the fees for ITs thus paying for itself in the first year. I would also argue that a closed end structure is more efficient as the manager isn't subject to inopportune inflows or outflows and can also take advantage of leveraging, if permitted by the board, to further enhance shareholder returns (or losses).

    Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter
  • ChilliBob
    ChilliBob Posts: 2,340 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There's pros and cons to both structures, depends on your circumstances really. I hold both structures for different things and via different platforms. I do find the stamp duty harder to swallow with something which is likely to yield a lowish return (obviously with lower risk) as it represents a larger chunk of the returns. All academic in years gone by yes! 
  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,361 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm with Interactive Investor so pay a fixed fee. 
    I don't think CGT uses leveraging. It would be a curious thing for a wealth preservation fund to do since it adds risk.
  • Bobziz
    Bobziz Posts: 669 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Shame there's no open ended version of CGT. After all, 0.5% is 0.5%.
    CG absolute return fund ?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.