We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Letter Before Claim received - from VCS, acting for Excel Parking Services
Comments
-
Thanks for your reply. Gonna look for Grizeback's post on it. Has to be submitted today.Fruitcake said:The new questions are covered by a thread started by poster Grizebeck, so I suggest you have a look at the comments there.
Always say no to a hearing on papers, but now you have to give a reason why.0 -
The implications of the case being heard on papers are that you would lose if you do not have a video/'phone/face to face hearing.StJohn81 said:
Sorry but this is not obvious to me at all, I do not know what implications would be of letting the judge decide with paperwork in or out of court. Thanks for your helpCoupon-mad said:IMHO it is pretty obvious what the answer to that question must be in every case but to find it discussed, just find the June thread about this new question, by @Grizebeck
You want the opportunity to pick holes in the claimant's statements.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
StJohn81 said:
Thanks for your reply. Gonna look for Grizeback's post on it. Has to be submitted today.Fruitcake said:The new questions are covered by a thread started by poster Grizebeck, so I suggest you have a look at the comments there.
Always say no to a hearing on papers, but now you have to give a reason why.
Grizebeck.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
Just click on his name. I provided it as a link.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
That's good to know, thanks I'll crack onFruitcake said:
The implications of the case being heard on papers are that you would lose if you do not have a video/'phone/face to face hearing.StJohn81 said:
Sorry but this is not obvious to me at all, I do not know what implications would be of letting the judge decide with paperwork in or out of court. Thanks for your helpCoupon-mad said:IMHO it is pretty obvious what the answer to that question must be in every case but to find it discussed, just find the June thread about this new question, by @Grizebeck
You want the opportunity to pick holes in the claimant's statements.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards