House insurance "overcharge" settlement - good offer or total bamboozle?

2 Posts

Hello everyone, I'll try to keep this short...
My mum's home insurance auto renews every year. She's elderly/disabled and doesn't think to check these kinds of things, but my sister and I have recently taken over handling all her financial stuff and after running some quotes online we found she's been paying well over the odds for home insurance for sticking with her provider.
She's paying roughly around £70 a month, when a new quote with a different provider comes in around an average of £30. Same level of cover, all past claims applied etc. (In most cases she'd actually be getting more cover with another company.)
Raised the issue with her current provider and they got back to me pretty quick offering an apology for not supporting her/checking the policy met her needs. They said their premiums calculator was correct but offered an apology by way of a settlement figure of around £600. Which includes the 8% interest and a £100 for the inconvenience. So I'm not entirely sure what the other £450 is based on, since they're claiming they're not wrong about their premiums.
Sounded great initially, but we've been discussing it with a neighbor this weekend and I'm wondering if my mum is potentially getting short changed again....
We ran a quote directly on her insurer's website for said neighbour's properly two doors down, pretty much identical houses, and we applied all the same details for claims and the same level of cover as my mum's paying for. Quote came back at £27 a month!!! (Similar ballpark for what new providers are offering mum.)
So, now I'm wondering why she's being charged £70 for the same levels of cover. And if she's been paying around £45 above what the same house/household would pay each month for God knows how many years, then £600 is a drop in a bucket for how much she's potentially been overcharged.
She's been auto renewing since 2015, and from what I can see the price has increased every year by around 2-4% and there was no really dramatic jump after making a couple of large-ish claims in 2018.
They're claiming the premium was calculated correctly, and that the £600 is in acknowledgement of the fact they didn't do more to support my mum, but I don't know how they got to that figure and it just all strikes me as strange right now.
I'm just wondering what to do here because I feel like maybe I'm being lead down the garden path into thinking this is a good settlement, when potentially if there's rounds for a claim for being overcharged on her premiums, it's obviously going to be more than they're offering now.
Can anyone advice on if she should accept the £600 or could she/we be being palmed off because they know they potentially could owe my mum a hell of a lot more for overcharging her year on year?
Could we accept the £600 for failing to support her as a disabled/elderly person, and still refer the complaint to the ombudsman to dispute the inflated premiums?
Any advice would be helpful. Thanks for reading.
My mum's home insurance auto renews every year. She's elderly/disabled and doesn't think to check these kinds of things, but my sister and I have recently taken over handling all her financial stuff and after running some quotes online we found she's been paying well over the odds for home insurance for sticking with her provider.
She's paying roughly around £70 a month, when a new quote with a different provider comes in around an average of £30. Same level of cover, all past claims applied etc. (In most cases she'd actually be getting more cover with another company.)
Raised the issue with her current provider and they got back to me pretty quick offering an apology for not supporting her/checking the policy met her needs. They said their premiums calculator was correct but offered an apology by way of a settlement figure of around £600. Which includes the 8% interest and a £100 for the inconvenience. So I'm not entirely sure what the other £450 is based on, since they're claiming they're not wrong about their premiums.
Sounded great initially, but we've been discussing it with a neighbor this weekend and I'm wondering if my mum is potentially getting short changed again....
We ran a quote directly on her insurer's website for said neighbour's properly two doors down, pretty much identical houses, and we applied all the same details for claims and the same level of cover as my mum's paying for. Quote came back at £27 a month!!! (Similar ballpark for what new providers are offering mum.)
So, now I'm wondering why she's being charged £70 for the same levels of cover. And if she's been paying around £45 above what the same house/household would pay each month for God knows how many years, then £600 is a drop in a bucket for how much she's potentially been overcharged.
She's been auto renewing since 2015, and from what I can see the price has increased every year by around 2-4% and there was no really dramatic jump after making a couple of large-ish claims in 2018.
They're claiming the premium was calculated correctly, and that the £600 is in acknowledgement of the fact they didn't do more to support my mum, but I don't know how they got to that figure and it just all strikes me as strange right now.
I'm just wondering what to do here because I feel like maybe I'm being lead down the garden path into thinking this is a good settlement, when potentially if there's rounds for a claim for being overcharged on her premiums, it's obviously going to be more than they're offering now.
Can anyone advice on if she should accept the £600 or could she/we be being palmed off because they know they potentially could owe my mum a hell of a lot more for overcharging her year on year?
Could we accept the £600 for failing to support her as a disabled/elderly person, and still refer the complaint to the ombudsman to dispute the inflated premiums?
Any advice would be helpful. Thanks for reading.
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Childcare budget boost
More support for children from nine months and those on Universal Credit
MSE News
Replies
As mentioned above, the FOS will not rule in her favour about being overcharged. They offered their premium and it was accepted. The failure to shop around is not their fault. However, she is getting lucky as vulnerable customer guidelines are currently in focus and goodwill gestures around vulnerable customers are likely to get more than they would do on a complaint than in normal times. It is also worth noting that goodwill gestures can be withdrawn if the case is referred to the FOS. In this case, the payout is very similar to the FOS fee.