Currys online ordring performance

mattyprice4004

Cool story, but what is your consumer rights question?  

Ergates

cx6 said:

For the avoidance of doubt, the word AND is TRUE if and only if (IFF) both conditions are met otherwise FALSE.

Thus fast AND free is only TRUE if it is both fast AND free. Otherwise it is FALSE.

Thus fish AND chips is TRUE if and only if both fish AND chips are supplied.

In that context true, *but* if a shop sells "Well sell fish AND chips" it doesn't necessarily mean that the fish and chips *have* to go together.  So if they sell chips on their own it doesn't necessarily falsify the statement.

FeaturelessVoid

They're probably using the same loophole Amazon does with its next day delivery promise with Prime, i.e it's next day after dispatch.

"Fast" in this example could also be "fast after dispatch" because I can't see a delivery company wanting to sit on bulky white goods for over a week.

cx6

Ergates said:

cx6 said:

For the avoidance of doubt, the word AND is TRUE if and only if (IFF) both conditions are met otherwise FALSE.

Thus fast AND free is only TRUE if it is both fast AND free. Otherwise it is FALSE.

Thus fish AND chips is TRUE if and only if both fish AND chips are supplied.

In that context true, *but* if a shop sells "Well sell fish AND chips" it doesn't necessarily mean that the fish and chips *have* to go together.  So if they sell chips on their own it doesn't necessarily falsify the statement.

Exactly But if they had a sign 'fish and chips £6' then you should get both ie
IF fish=TRUE AND chips=TRUE THEN price=£6

Shows why there are so many bugs in computer programming!