We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fight with the council…advice needed!

Options
2»

Comments

  • One of the reasons it took a while for him to become aware of the refund fraud was cause there was so much confusion around him switching from a joint account to a single one and therefore being able to claim for the single person reduction that this is the amount of paperwork he received in 2020 from the council!! It’s unreal, and they kept getting their figures mixed up so at one point they said he owed £3k! Absolute mess!
  • Occams Razor - despite your certainty that it isn't, to me this sounds as if the ex has extracted the money from a joint account. Legally speaking, she and the council would therefore have done nothing wrong: if she passed their identity checks, she is as entitled to the money in the joint account as your other half (much the same as a joint account at a bank).
  • ciderboy2009
    ciderboy2009 Posts: 1,243 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Car Insurance Carver!
    The easiest way to check if the name on the account is the ex is to attempt to send a small payment to it from your bank online by setting it up as a new recipient with the ex's name - your banking app should warn you if the name doesn't match.
  • Ditzy_Mitzy
    Ditzy_Mitzy Posts: 1,953 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Something about this doesn't add up.  To wit.

    Account One (single): £500 in arrears, 

    Account Two (joint): £500 in credit

    Extraction of funds occurs 

    Account One (single): £500 in arrears

    Account Two (joint): nil balance

    What has happened to the arrears on Account One? 

    Re-reading the OP's first account, the following text appears: it became obvious to my partner something had happened, and he realised somehow someone had gotten almost £500 of his council tax payments refunded. The irony is, no one will help my partner because technically speaking he isn’t involved, he hasn’t lost any money and he hasn’t been the victim of fraud, the council have

    I read that as suggesting, without specifically saying, that the council have written off the arrears on Account One.  Have they?  There will be some admission of a mistake in that case.  The problem, if that is the case, is exactly as the OP has described: the partner is a victim of nothing.  He owed the council £500 and has paid them £500; everything balances so there's nothing to pursue in the civil court.  Crime?  Yes, potentially, but the victim is now the council given that they are the aggrieved party; the £500 write off on Account One was made with their money, given that the OP's partner's money has now gone.  

    Which brings us to a bigger question: why do you care?  Why are you so desperate for the council, a third party, to pursue another third party, Miss Ann Nonymous-Fraudster of Leicester?  Unless, of course, the identity of the fraudster is known and you feel he or she ought to be punished.  It's a strange point of principle to wish to carry on with otherwise.  
  • ...Re-reading the OP's first account, the following text appears: it became obvious to my partner something had happened, and he realised somehow someone had gotten almost £500 of his council tax payments refunded. The irony is, no one will help my partner because technically speaking he isn’t involved, he hasn’t lost any money and he hasn’t been the victim of fraud, the council have

    I read that as suggesting, without specifically saying, that the council have written off the arrears on Account One.  Have they?  There will be some admission of a mistake in that case.  The problem, if that is the case, is exactly as the OP has described: the partner is a victim of nothing.  He owed the council £500 and has paid them £500; everything balances so there's nothing to pursue in the civil court.  Crime?  Yes, potentially, but the victim is now the council given that they are the aggrieved party; the £500 write off on Account One was made with their money, given that the OP's partner's money has now gone... 
    Hmmm.

    Fair point that it's not clear what loss the OP's partner has suffered or what they are complaining about regarding this £500?
  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,045 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Something about this doesn't add up.  To wit.

    Account One (single): £500 in arrears, 

    Account Two (joint): £500 in credit

    Extraction of funds occurs 

    Account One (single): £500 in arrears

    Account Two (joint): nil balance

    What has happened to the arrears on Account One? 

    Re-reading the OP's first account, the following text appears: it became obvious to my partner something had happened, and he realised somehow someone had gotten almost £500 of his council tax payments refunded. The irony is, no one will help my partner because technically speaking he isn’t involved, he hasn’t lost any money and he hasn’t been the victim of fraud, the council have

    I read that as suggesting, without specifically saying, that the council have written off the arrears on Account One.  Have they?  There will be some admission of a mistake in that case.  The problem, if that is the case, is exactly as the OP has described: the partner is a victim of nothing.  He owed the council £500 and has paid them £500; everything balances so there's nothing to pursue in the civil court.  Crime?  Yes, potentially, but the victim is now the council given that they are the aggrieved party; the £500 write off on Account One was made with their money, given that the OP's partner's money has now gone.  

    Which brings us to a bigger question: why do you care?  Why are you so desperate for the council, a third party, to pursue another third party, Miss Ann Nonymous-Fraudster of Leicester?  Unless, of course, the identity of the fraudster is known and you feel he or she ought to be punished.  It's a strange point of principle to wish to carry on with otherwise.  
    I believe Account One is still in arrears and the OP's partner still owes the money.  So the council hasn't been the victim of fraud, the partner has. They paid money to the wrong account, before they could get this rectified (and the arrears on the other account cleared) somebody else had the money refunded to a different account.  OP's partner's money is gone and they still have to pay the council.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.