PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Buy to let

Are BTL as of 2022 still a viable investment option, considered best performing Vs say a stocks and shares passive investment option, with a say 20 year forecast?

Comments

  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 February 2022 at 12:20PM
    Ask me in 20 year's time and we'll tell you.  Until then , whatever anyone says, it's a guess   Anyone!

    Certainly in my experience it's not as profitable as it used to be.   

    Only go into b2l if you have both the financial and emotional reserves to cope with the tenant from hell (or agent from,...), Voids, unexpected huge repair bills, 'phone call Saturday 10:30pm about toilet leaking through ceiling onto sofa and carpet in lounge, angry tenants visiting you at your home (they have the right to your actual address) further burdens of legislation or taxation etc etc etc.  Oh and interest rate rises.  I had a for then large mortgage when BoE interest rates hit 17% under Thatcher, November 1979, my building society was kind and only charging me 15%. Painful.

    Happy days!
  • dimbo61
    dimbo61 Posts: 13,727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    No one knows the answer to this question.
    You might invest in the best company Scottish Mortgages have done very well in Tech stocks.
    You might buy the Right BTL property in the right location at the right time with the right mortgage and ltv.
    You might have a brilliant tenant for the next 20 years.
    United might win the premier League this year

  • Investing in things or companies that have done well in the past, using history as your guide, is just as prudent as driving a car only looking out the back window.
  • Thanks!

    I think it was viable 5-10 years ago at the latest, but since more regulations etc, harder entryway to market have made things difficult and you should only do it as the last option in portfolio.

    SS ISA wrappers in global passive stocks and shares drip fed over 20 years, tax free, can/is more lucrative and stress free. Anymore arguments for/against especially given the current climate, maybe we'll all be dead soon anyway!
  • MEM62
    MEM62 Posts: 5,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 February 2022 at 1:20PM
    Are BTL as of 2022 still a viable investment option, considered best performing Vs say a stocks and shares passive investment option, with a say 20 year forecast?
    I can only speak from a personal point of view but I am selling.  I am an 'accidental' landlord as we kept my flat when my OH and I bought a house together almost six years ago.  I am selling for numerous reasons;

    * It is not tax efficient by any means and, if you do it properly as I do, the returns on your investment are not stellar.  (And my place was mortgage-free!) 
    * Being a landlord is a commitment and must be done properly.  As I live 45 miles away from the property and no longer have family ties to the area, managing things are a greater pain that I want.
    * The current rules and regulations surrounding letting are not landlord friendly and I believe that they will become even more onerous in the future.
    * The property is not increasing in value yet each years my CGT liability increases.  

    Those are basically my personal reasons for selling - added to the fact that I will filter much of the equity from the sale into my pension over the next few years - which gives me an instant 25% uplift.  Most people still see BTL through rose-tinted glasses.  It is not the holy grail of investing.  Almost all that consider it under estimate the costs (fees, insurances, maintenance etc) and the risks (void periods, tenants not looking after the property and potential defaults on rent payments).  Consider the recent ruling during COVID where all evictions were banned.  Could you have dealt with that if you had a problem tenant in place at the time?

    It may work for some but it is no longer for me.          

            
  • Interesting.  Always find it odd that people "accidentally" sign tenancy agreement etc etc etc.

    But hey, guess it could happen.
  • Thanks!

    I think it was viable 5-10 years ago at the latest, but since more regulations etc, harder entryway to market have made things difficult and you should only do it as the last option in portfolio.

    SS ISA wrappers in global passive stocks and shares drip fed over 20 years, tax free, can/is more lucrative and stress free. Anymore arguments for/against especially given the current climate, maybe we'll all be dead soon anyway!
    If interest rates get forced up by the current turmoil the HPI aspect that used to take the sting out of voids/repairs etc. won`t be there any more for new BTL buyers.
  • MEM62
    MEM62 Posts: 5,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Interesting.  Always find it odd that people "accidentally" sign tenancy agreement etc etc etc.

    But hey, guess it could happen.
    A always find the phrase amusing too but that's how HMRC refer to my situation.   
  • I have had a BTL since 2015 (intentional!).  

    We will be selling up if our tenants, who are excellent, leave.  This is because of the onerous rules regarding letting, which are all in the tenant's favour, the fact that it takes about a year to evict any toxic tenant, even if they have paid you no rent and/or trashed the place.  This can occur even if you had good references for them, because a) they can fake them or b) a former landlord can give a glowing reference just to get rid of them.  There is also so much paperwork that has to be given at the beginning of the tenancy and if you don't do it right, you can't legally serve notice.  You also have to do the work of the home office by checking their 'right to rent' before the tenancy starts.

    Financially it is not the big earner that many people believe it it be, especially if you have a mortgage (we haven't) or an older property that needs constant maintenance (our flat was built in 2014, so so far has needed minimal maintenance)..

    Hope this helps.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • london21
    london21 Posts: 2,128 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    No one knows the future for certain.

    Accidental landlord LOL

    Depends on the amount you have to invest, your risk apetitie, are you ok with the responsibility of been a full time landlord etc. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.