We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Vendor insisting I perform pre-exchange viewing alone and cannot bring builders or trades
climbthatwallseegar
Posts: 121 Forumite
Hello All,
I've been on this board for the best part of a year now after selling my property last year and am now finally in the home stretch of my purchase after a tortuous few months.
The house I am buying does not have buildings insurance in place. The vendor allowed it to expire last year, she didn't see the point in renewing as she was selling up. My solicitor advised that we could not proceed to exchange with an uninsured property (I know I have to take out insurance myself from the point of exchange itself). After a bit of back and forth we reached an agreement that on the day of exchange I will visit the property and if all is in order I will give permission to go ahead. Vendor was amenable to all of this.
The EA contacted me today to say vendor has agreed to exchange next week but I cannot visit with any builders/trades. I had no intention of bringing a builder but this has certainly raised a red flag for me. As it happens I am visiting with my partner as he hasn't seen the property before and he worked in building/DIY in a former life but again, there was no intention on my part to ask him to carry out any checks as I've already had a survey done. I just need to ensure the roof hasn't blown off or anything major.
I'm thinking there must be some kind of damage somewhere to property that she doesn't want anyone to inspect?
0
Comments
-
Maybe she's nervous about Covid.You had a survey, that's enough, surely?Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
1 -
Vendor may require such conditions as they wish.
Buyer may require such conditions as they wish.
So, in your shoes, I'd get my solicitors to 'phone his solicitors & explain the deal is off unless builder and specific list of trades (or none) can view with you.
If not the answer you need, walk away (unless you wish to gamble**)
** I bought a house, at auction, without even going inside, just drove past it. Children do not do this at home. But I could afford the gamble, bought Jan 2000 still own it, still generating rents...0 -
I find the no insurance more of a red flag tbh
No trades might simply be to avoid a last minute request to drop the price because such and such will cost £x1 -
Doozergirl said:Maybe she's nervous about Covid.You had a survey, that's enough, surely?Yes the survey is enough as I wanted information about structural issues, the roof etc and all came back fine.So to be clear, I had no intention of bringing a builder - just my partner (who coincidentally used to be a builder but that is not why he is coming).My concern is her insistence that she doesn't want one to visit. If she hadn't mentioned this requirement there wouldn't be problem.I doubt Covid is an issue. When I viewed I was fully masked up. She followed myself and the EA around without a mask (this is not a judgement, just explaining).I have asked the EA why she is insisting on this. He said he doesn't know. My thoughts are that something major has happened since the start of storm Eunice and as the house is uninsured at this point that is obviously a concern.
0 -
That's a silly approach isn't it. The vendor likely states this so that the buyer doesn't try a 11th hour renegotiation by having a trade kick the tyres and say that needs replacing. Totally reasonable to state that they don't want other people other than the buyer in the house.theartfullodger said:Vendor may require such conditions as they wish.
Buyer may require such conditions as they wish.
So, in your shoes, I'd get my solicitors to 'phone his solicitors & explain the deal is off unless builder and specific list of trades (or none) can view with you.
If not the answer you need, walk away (unless you wish to gamble**)
I bought a house, at auction, without even going inside, just drove past it. Children do not do this at home. But I could afford the gamble, bought Jan 2000 still own it, still generating rents...
The OP wasn't even bringing a builder/trades person with them anyway so your point is redundant.
OP you could ask them why not? There could be a genuine reason. Assuming something bad before determining the facts can muddy the water.1 -
Surely if your partner is knowledgeable then anything serious will be spotted. I was going to suggest you take a tame builder/handy person with you and introduce only as "my best friend Lee, here with me for moral support" or similar.I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe, Old Style Money Saving and Pensions boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
Click on this link for a Statement of Accounts that can be posted on the DebtFree Wannabe board: https://lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php
Check your state pension on: Check your State Pension forecast - GOV.UK
"Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.” Nellie McClung
⭐️🏅😇🏅🏅🏅🏅2 -
TheJP said:
That's a silly approach isn't it. The vendor likely states this so that the buyer doesn't try a 11th hour renegotiation by having a trade kick the tyres and say that needs replacing. Totally reasonable to state that they don't want other people other than the buyer in the house.theartfullodger said:Vendor may require such conditions as they wish.
Buyer may require such conditions as they wish.
So, in your shoes, I'd get my solicitors to 'phone his solicitors & explain the deal is off unless builder and specific list of trades (or none) can view with you.
If not the answer you need, walk away (unless you wish to gamble**)
I bought a house, at auction, without even going inside, just drove past it. Children do not do this at home. But I could afford the gamble, bought Jan 2000 still own it, still generating rents...
The OP wasn't even bringing a builder/trades person with them anyway so your point is redundant.
OP you could ask them why not? There could be a genuine reason. Assuming something bad before determining the facts can muddy the water.
Cross-post with my answer above, I have asked.
1 -
That was my first thought when I read that the EA had contacted you today.climbthatwallseegar said
My thoughts are that something major has happened since the start of storm Eunice and as the house is uninsured at this point that is obviously a concern.0 -
If something major had happened that she noticed, then you'd notice it too. Anything major isn't just going to be spotted by a builder. Particularly storm damage.climbthatwallseegar said:Doozergirl said:Maybe she's nervous about Covid.You had a survey, that's enough, surely?Yes the survey is enough as I wanted information about structural issues, the roof etc and all came back fine.So to be clear, I had no intention of bringing a builder - just my partner (who coincidentally used to be a builder but that is not why he is coming).My concern is her insistence that she doesn't want one to visit. If she hadn't mentioned this requirement there wouldn't be problem.I doubt Covid is an issue. When I viewed I was fully masked up. She followed myself and the EA around without a mask (this is not a judgement, just explaining).I have asked the EA why she is insisting on this. He said he doesn't know. My thoughts are that something major has happened since the start of storm Eunice and as the house is uninsured at this point that is obviously a concern.It's never a good idea to wonder why people do anything, because you'll rarely be right.There's as many reasons for saying or doing something as there are people.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
5 -
Sorry OP i missed this post.climbthatwallseegar said:Doozergirl said:Maybe she's nervous about Covid.You had a survey, that's enough, surely?Yes the survey is enough as I wanted information about structural issues, the roof etc and all came back fine.So to be clear, I had no intention of bringing a builder - just my partner (who coincidentally used to be a builder but that is not why he is coming).My concern is her insistence that she doesn't want one to visit. If she hadn't mentioned this requirement there wouldn't be problem.I doubt Covid is an issue. When I viewed I was fully masked up. She followed myself and the EA around without a mask (this is not a judgement, just explaining).I have asked the EA why she is insisting on this. He said he doesn't know. My thoughts are that something major has happened since the start of storm Eunice and as the house is uninsured at this point that is obviously a concern.
For me my thoughts would be that the seller may think your pulling a fast one. As doozergirl said if there is something that they are concern about you'll spot it. Youll also struggle to get a builder/trade to come out with you as they are extremely hard to get hold off and doubt they will fancy a walkabout over a committed job.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

