Benefit of your hindsight with Global Tracker Funds

The impressive discussions (Global Equities, next decade)  and your experiences of drops lately make me feel  really out of my depth but also curious. I understand the equity markets is volatile at the moment.

 So, should  investors with a large cash lump sum to invest for 10 - 15 years buy Global tracker funds take advantage when there is flash news of the market drop eg yesterday's drop  ? Because it would be silly to buy Global tracker funds now, if you can wait a bit. I know investors drip feed but if you got a lumpsum it must be different scenario because each transaction costs £5 and sitting as a lumpsum sitting in cash gets very low interest.

Is taking advantage of a dip not apply to  funds as I am not sure whether it takes 3-4 days to complete that keeping your ears for the news is futile? Or is it only shares because the price is the actual  price and the purchase is immediate.

 


«1

Comments

  • george4064
    george4064 Posts: 2,923 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Don’t mess around with trying to time the market, just invest as soon as you can with as much as you can afford to risk and ride it out.
    "If you aren’t willing to own a stock for ten years, don’t even think about owning it for ten minutes” Warren Buffett

    Save £12k in 2025 - #024 £1,450 / £15,000 (9%)
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 12 February 2022 at 1:57PM
    Have a read of

    Wealth Creation in the U.S. Public Stock Markets 1926 to 2019 Hendrik Bessembinder


    The abstract summary of the paper is below:-

    This report quantifies long-run stock market outcomes in terms of the increases or decreases (relative to a Treasury bill benchmark) in shareholder wealth, when considering the full history of both net cash distributions and capital appreciation. The study includes all of the 26,168 firms with publicly-traded U.S. common stock since 1926. Despite the fact that investments in the majority (57.8%) of stocks led to reduced rather than increased shareholder wealth, U.S. stock market investments on net increased shareholder wealth by $47.4 trillion between 1926 and 2019. Technology firms accounted for the largest share, $9.0 trillion, of the total, but Telecommunications, Energy, and Healthcare/ Pharmaceutical stocks created wealth disproportionate to the numbers of firms in the industries. The degree to which stock market wealth creation is concentrated in a few top-performing firms has increased over time, and was particularly strong during the most recent three years, when five firms accounted for 22% of net wealth creation. These results should be of interest to any long-term investor assessing the relative merits of broad diversification vs. narrow portfolio selection.

    It's these top performing companies which have propelled global equity funds in recent years. 
  • mears1 said:

    The impressive discussions (Global Equities, next decade)  and your experiences of drops lately make me feel  really out of my depth but also curious. I understand the equity markets is volatile at the moment.

     So, should  investors with a large cash lump sum to invest for 10 - 15 years buy Global tracker funds take advantage when there is flash news of the market drop eg yesterday's drop  ? Because it would be silly to buy Global tracker funds now, if you can wait a bit. I know investors drip feed but if you got a lumpsum it must be different scenario because each transaction costs £5 and sitting as a lumpsum sitting in cash gets very low interest.

    Is taking advantage of a dip not apply to  funds as I am not sure whether it takes 3-4 days to complete that keeping your ears for the news is futile? Or is it only shares because the price is the actual  price and the purchase is immediate.



    Depends on your platform of choice. The cheapest may charge per transaction, but others might allow a number of or even limitless transactions, so if you want that flexibility you can always pay for it. As mentioned above, trying to time the market is hard, so if you are on a per-transaction cost fund you could just get it in there and then look away for the next five years. Or what I tend to do in moments of indecision is split the difference - so in your shoes I'd stick 50% in now and then 50% in at some future point in time - maybe 6 months or sooner if there's a dip of another 20% beforehand.

    Funds typically have a daily dealing point and an instruction cut off before this, so you won't be trying to time an intraday dip, but getting fund pricing on the same day as you're interested is quite possible (completion often takes longer, but the pricing is fixed at the dealing point and that's the main thing).
  • mears1
    mears1 Posts: 158 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper

    Thank you all. Very enlightening and has brought some clarity. So, keeping up with the news is futile with funds, after all!

     How does this sound?

    Use half the lumpsum  to buy funds split between several global trackers via iWeb.

           Fidelity Index World P

            HSBC Ftse All-world Index C

     Then in 6 months buy different global trackers with the other half

            L & G International Index I

     Then from this April, drip feed my full isa allowance monthly into Vanguard products ie. FTSE Developed World ex-UK equity index fund combined with FTSE U.K. All Share Index Unit Trust  because of no fees for regular transactions. Then transfer this in species to iWeb because of the iWeb do not have platform charges and transfer is free.

     Is this correct, that you can transfer funds in species to iWeb? Can you do it the other way, funds in iWeb to Interactive investor?

     Because of the high value of the ISA, I am leaning towards a few global funds as I feel scared to put it all in one product! Does that make sense?


  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 9,735 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    All you would be achieving is massive duplication
  • GeoffTF
    GeoffTF Posts: 1,875 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    mears1 said:

    Thank you all. Very enlightening and has brought some clarity. So, keeping up with the news is futile with funds, after all!

     How does this sound?

    Use half the lumpsum  to buy funds split between several global trackers via iWeb.

           Fidelity Index World P

            HSBC Ftse All-world Index C

     Then in 6 months buy different global trackers with the other half

            L & G International Index I

     Then from this April, drip feed my full isa allowance monthly into Vanguard products ie. FTSE Developed World ex-UK equity index fund combined with FTSE U.K. All Share Index Unit Trust  because of no fees for regular transactions. Then transfer this in species to iWeb because of the iWeb do not have platform charges and transfer is free.

     Is this correct, that you can transfer funds in species to iWeb? Can you do it the other way, funds in iWeb to Interactive investor?

     Because of the high value of the ISA, I am leaning towards a few global funds as I feel scared to put it all in one product! Does that make sense?


    It will just make life harder if you split your money between several global trackers. Just choose one of them. Transfers are often very slow currently. You will most likely save yourself a lot of pain by starting with the platform that you intend to use long term.
  • valiant24
    valiant24 Posts: 444 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 12 February 2022 at 5:31PM
    GeoffTF said:
     Transfers are often very slow currently. 
    Especially with iWeb, mentioned by the OP.   I started 5 transfers into iWeb last year; only 2 are complete thus far and one of those took 5 months, and relied on the good nature of a lady at the platform losing my business to keep my updated!

    iWeb's good once you're there though, in my experience.
  • mears1
    mears1 Posts: 158 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks all. Appreciate your clear answers, this website is very  helpful.
  • ChilliBob
    ChilliBob Posts: 2,296 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I echo the iweb transfers comments.

    Fidelity world p and HSBC are different trackers, ones all of world one just developed, one MSCI methodology, one FTSE. I do hold both actually as it spreads the risk of just having something with one manager (I'm not suggesting either will go bankrupt or anything, just if there was some reason you couldn't sell for a certain period or something).

    Lots of trackers wouldn't be a good idea though, if you need to sell to realise a gain (hopefully!) you'd have more transaction costs if you needed to sell more funds. 

    As regards lump sum vs drip, I'd have been waaaaay better off if I had just lumpsummed everything in about 12 months ago. However, I was getting used to everything. Things are even more Volatile now. Whilst lump sum has been proven to be the best I think it's difficult mentally, especially if you're a new investor. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.