We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Company Vehicle Speeding Fine
Comments
-
He's subsequently been "elsewhere" and, unsurprisingly, has been asked similar questions. He's not responded there either.
To understand fully what is happening - and has happened so far - the OP needs to find out the answers to the questions I asked him in the third post on this thread 3 days ago.0 -
If they haven't responded giving the information that is in their power to give, then it is the company that is legally responsible. The speeding fine is dead in the water as it is way past the 6 month, and the police would need a nomination on the S172 that they would presumably have received if the company is the nominated party. That's kind of my point.Manxman_in_exile said:
What?ontheroad1970 said:If the company has been named but not you personally, then they as a company have committed a crime that you cannot now be charged with. Who is named on the summons?
But yes, without the OP coming back and gibing us answer`s, there isn't a lot we can say0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards