Divorce and pension sharing

Hello 
My question surrounds short term marriage 7 years and even shorter living together 3 years during the marriage although over the 14 Yr relationship we saw each other every weekend. 
In terms of our 'unconventional' marriage. How are the courts likely to view such a short-term living together arrangement at both her old and new addresses? Im concerned the courts will not be favourable to my cause because of the shortness of living together ? 
I would prefer a frank overview here so I can decide what to do next. 
Thank you"

Replies

  • TBagpussTBagpuss Forumite
    10.9K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    If you were married for 7 years then the court is likely to take that into account even if you didn't always live in the same house, however it's worth bearing in mind that the overriding aim is to achieve a settlement that is fair over all - so things such as your ages, needs an whether you kept your finances generally separate during the marriage may also be relevant . 
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • FlossFloss Forumite
    7K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    When I started my divorce in 2018 I was advised that 8 years married + 4 years living together immediately before marriage would be classed as a "long relationship". Where you lived is likely to be of little importance.

    If either of you have a pension, it is unlikely to be a quick process as the financial agreement will need to be ratified by the court. 
    2021 Decluttering Awards: ⭐⭐🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇 2022 DeclutteringAwards: 🥇
  • Bravery4Bravery4 Forumite
    6 Posts
    First Post
    Forumite
    Hi thanks for your replies 
    We're both in our 60s 
    I have no pension provisions my wife does so I'd be interested to know how much of a claim if any am I entitled to? 
    If course, there are circumstances to both sides of this it's just the principle I'm after 
    Thank you 

  • TBagpussTBagpuss Forumite
    10.9K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    The principle is tht a court has to try to reach a settlement which is fair to you both, taking into account all relevant circumstances.

    There isn't a simple formula that tells you what you will be entitled to.

    For instance, if your wife was married when she was in her mid-to-late 50s, it's likely that most of her pension was built up before that, so it's unlikely to be fair that you have a 50% share.

    A court also considers what your respective needs are - so will look at the over all financial position - your respective incomes and earning capacity, housing needs, state pension provision, other pensions etc. They won't lok at pensions in isolation, but consider them together with all other assets and issues.

    You need to talk to a solicitor and will need to gather and provide to them your financial details, for them to be able to properly advise you. 


    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • Bravery4Bravery4 Forumite
    6 Posts
    First Post
    Forumite
    Thank you for your reply it's very useful 
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

British Gas prepay meter users...

...to pay less for gas from 1 April

MSE News

The 'odd Easter flavours' thread 2023

What bizarre food stuffs have you spied?

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools