We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
EWS1 downgraded


Comments
-
@helenpet64 The bad news is that yes, this will most likely impact a remortgage or a sale as mainstream lenders will not lend unless you have at least a B1 rating.
The less bad news is that as long as your son doesn't need to borrow more or change term, he can stick with the same lender and (in most cases) switch to a new fix (it's called a product transfer, product switch or rate switch) when he gets to the end of the current one.
I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
0 -
Surely, the really bad news is that your son is about to be hit for a (probably) 5 figure bill for recladding?
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Thank you for your replies. I was hoping someone could shed light on why it is possible for the grading to be changed when its importance is so great. My son would not, could not, have bought the flat with a B2 rating. He went ahead as he was reassured by the certificate and the statement that ‘no remedial work’ was necessary. The person issuing the statement was supposed to be a competent expert! We are completely bemused that given the seriousness of this situation, the expert is not accountable in any way.0
-
What makes you think that the expert is not accountable?You have not said what the reason is for the regrading? If it’s a change in rules, you cannot blame the expert, but if he missed something obvious surely he is liable?No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
-
GDB2222 said:What makes you think that the expert is not accountable?You have not said what the reason is for the regrading? If it’s a change in rules, you cannot blame the expert, but if he missed something obvious surely he is liable?0
-
Helenpet64 said:GDB2222 said:What makes you think that the expert is not accountable?You have not said what the reason is for the regrading? If it’s a change in rules, you cannot blame the expert, but if he missed something obvious surely he is liable?
I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
0 -
This sounds a bit dodgy the inspection needs to be done by a chartered fire engineer so your son needs to obtain the certificate to see who signed it off and if it wasn't he can take further action. Which have had a campaign on this as many unscrupulous surveyors have been falsely saying they can do them but can't just google the which website.0
-
Helenpet64 said:GDB2222 said:What makes you think that the expert is not accountable?You have not said what the reason is for the regrading? If it’s a change in rules, you cannot blame the expert, but if he missed something obvious surely he is liable?
Your son really does need to find exactly what is going on. He needs copies of both reports, and the second one should explain the reasons for the differences.
This is going to be a major issue for all the owners, so it might be worth asking around, especially any leaseholder association.
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
coypondboy said:This sounds a bit dodgy the inspection needs to be done by a chartered fire engineer so your son needs to obtain the certificate to see who signed it off and if it wasn't he can take further action. Which have had a campaign on this as many unscrupulous surveyors have been falsely saying they can do them but can't just google the which website.
I am a Which? member, but I can't find much about what you are saying. They do say:
"Which? has found evidence of scammers signing off EWS1 certificates using fake signatures of chartered surveyors who didn’t do the work and had no idea their names were being used.
Read more: https://www.which.co.uk/news/2021/03/revealed-the-five-major-costs-the-cladding-crisis-is-piling-on-homeowners/ - Which?"
I don't think there's any evidence of a scam in this particular case, just a change in the report.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
Thanks again for the responses. The managing agents won’t supply a copy of the first report. They say it was for ‘internal use’ only. But they have said that the first inspection was a ‘desk top’ exercise using the plans for the building and various data, and that that resulted in the EWS1 being issued with a B1 rating. They say that they decided to then do further tests that actually involved testing a piece of the cladding and that has caused the downgrade to B2. I am astounded that the EWS1 was issued without a proper inspection! How many others have these certificates that aren’t worth the paper they are written on. And where does it leave people like my son who bought in good faith believing that the EWs1 was proficient?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards