Napier Court Claim Form

B789

agent17 said:
 Also, I was under the impression from when I did this before that I had to write it all as defendant but I have amended that now and changed to I/me/myself.

Possibly why Dack thought you were a d!ck.  We are all hoping that you don't get Judge Dack again but with a more coherent WS, who knows, even he may be persuaded to actually pay more attention to the defendant.

I'm just wondering if a complaint can be made against a judge for their behaviour in court. Irrespective of the findings of the judge, if they were acting all "pally" with the Claimants legal rep and appeared to be ignoring or excluding the Defendant who is not a part of the legal profession and so making them distressed or whatever, can that be something that could/should be pursued?

Coupon-mad

Judges are almost always pally with the reps they see all the time.  I've experienced it myself.  Still won!

B789

Coupon-mad said:

Judges are almost always pally with the reps they see all the time.  I've experienced it myself.  Still won!

Yes, but we all know how battle-hardened you are! 

Coupon-mad

Hell hath no fury...

Taiko

For what it's worth, I haven't seen Dack listed at Portsmouth for months. Some of the parking ones have been reallocated to Havant also. 

Buoyed by my win in Brighton recently, and depending on when it is, I might even come and observe! 

agent17

B789 said:

agent17 said:
 Also, I was under the impression from when I did this before that I had to write it all as defendant but I have amended that now and changed to I/me/myself.

Possibly why Dack thought you were a d!ck.  We are all hoping that you don't get Judge Dack again but with a more coherent WS, who knows, even he may be persuaded to actually pay more attention to the defendant.

I'm just wondering if a complaint can be made against a judge for their behaviour in court. Irrespective of the findings of the judge, if they were acting all "pally" with the Claimants legal rep and appeared to be ignoring or excluding the Defendant who is not a part of the legal profession and so making them distressed or whatever, can that be something that could/should be pursued?

Bit harsh, it never felt like he thought I was a d!ck, that's normally reserved for people who actually know me... 

To be fair, the witness statement I posted here last time had defendant all over it and nobody mentioned it so I thought that was the way to do it. Also, I believed, my case and evidence were pretty good based on feedback from the good fold here.

I guess if I did this more often I would have been more forceful at the hearing myself instead of just sitting there and taking up the proverbial... 

agent17

Taiko said:

For what it's worth, I haven't seen Dack listed at Portsmouth for months. Some of the parking ones have been reallocated to Havant also. 

Buoyed by my win in Brighton recently, and depending on when it is, I might even come and observe! 

Hope he's never seen here again lol.

I'd be very happy if it got switched to Havant, the judge there who did my mediation hearing last time (still don't understand why I had to do that when I requested no mediation), was 100% on my side and suggested they gave up their claim as there seemed little point in pursuing it. Shows how wrong he was, guess he'd never heard of Dack 

Taiko

Hit the road, Dack. Don't you come back no more no more no more no more...

agent17

Received a Notice Of Discontinuance today from B&W after numerous offers of settlement. Which I binned instantly of course lol.

Happy days, but they've wasted so much of my time with this nonsense and I'm sure many people cave in and pay up just to get rid of them. It's so wrong really...

Thanks for the help/advice guys, keep up the good work 

Coupon-mad

agent17 said:

Received a Notice Of Discontinuance today from B&W after numerous offers of settlement. Which I binned instantly of course lol.

Happy days, but they've wasted so much of my time with this nonsense and I'm sure many people cave in and pay up just to get rid of them. It's so wrong really...

Thanks for the help/advice guys, keep up the good work 

Yay - well done!  

Another Napier & BW Legal one bites the dust!

Now, please do us and yourself (and the driving public) a favour and stick around on this forum to ensure you see when the Government publish and open the final Public Consultation (expected in July).

Please please come back to take part in the final Public Consultation to change and cement the law and ban the fake + £70 extortionate debt 'fees'.

Come back and be heard by the Government.  Your only chance.

Read, bookmark and set email alerts for new posts on the 2022 replies in the top sticky thread by MSE_JC.

We will tell everyone there when the Public Consultation opens.