We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How much would this extension cost in South West London?
Options
Comments
-
Rosa_Damascena said:Typhoon2000 said:Yes the the ground floor extension side extension seems to add very little to the project. Dropping just the side extension would probably save £50k, maybe more. And you would loose only the downstairs w/c or utility ( you will have space for 1 or an other) and about a meter width from the kitchen. I can’t imagine there would be any problems getting the altered plans approved if it results in a smaller development.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
1 -
Doozergirl said:Rosa_Damascena said:Typhoon2000 said:Yes the the ground floor extension side extension seems to add very little to the project. Dropping just the side extension would probably save £50k, maybe more. And you would loose only the downstairs w/c or utility ( you will have space for 1 or an other) and about a meter width from the kitchen. I can’t imagine there would be any problems getting the altered plans approved if it results in a smaller development.
I actually quite like the proposed plan, and if it was a forever home would go for it knowing that any loss would be notional. As a FTB that is unlikely to be the case although how any young person can afford this beats me.No man is worth crawling on this earth.
So much to read, so little time.1 -
Rosa_Damascena said:Doozergirl said:Rosa_Damascena said:Typhoon2000 said:Yes the the ground floor extension side extension seems to add very little to the project. Dropping just the side extension would probably save £50k, maybe more. And you would loose only the downstairs w/c or utility ( you will have space for 1 or an other) and about a meter width from the kitchen. I can’t imagine there would be any problems getting the altered plans approved if it results in a smaller development.
I actually quite like the proposed plan, and if it was a forever home would go for it knowing that any loss would be notional. As a FTB that is unlikely to be the case although how any young person can afford this beats me.The downstairs works fine without it, just needs some thought. Smaller loo and a different dedicated space for the WM and TD.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
1 -
Thanks everyone!Here’s the house listing if anyone wants to see it for a clearer view https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/1179902842
-
newhomebuild said:Thanks everyone!Here’s the house listing if anyone wants to see it for a clearer viewSeeing the pictures showing how narrow the space at the side is should help convince anyone with remaining doubts that extending at the side just makes no sense at all.The access track at the side looks as if it may be publicly owned (at least the street light suggests that) - which means anyone deciding to go ahead with the plan will also need to negotiate with the council(?) for rights for the foundations and eaves of the side extension to be in that land - or redesign the side extension making it narrower to fit within the property boundary. (unlike a privately owning neighbour, councils are less easily persuaded by a sniff of money) The need to maintain access along the track will also cause difficulties during the build.On the plus side, the garden is quite large by London standards, so there's no obvious reason not to go for the far simpler option of creating all the additional space at the rear.2
-
Section62 said:newhomebuild said:Thanks everyone!Here’s the house listing if anyone wants to see it for a clearer viewSeeing the pictures showing how narrow the space at the side is should help convince anyone with remaining doubts that extending at the side just makes no sense at all.The access track at the side looks as if it may be publicly owned (at least the street light suggests that) - which means anyone deciding to go ahead with the plan will also need to negotiate with the council(?) for rights for the foundations and eaves of the side extension to be in that land - or redesign the side extension making it narrower to fit within the property boundary. (unlike a privately owning neighbour, councils are less easily persuaded by a sniff of money) The need to maintain access along the track will also cause difficulties during the build.On the plus side, the garden is quite large by London standards, so there's no obvious reason not to go for the far simpler option of creating all the additional space at the rear.
Thank you and thank you everyone!
This forum is the best0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards