We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
EPC ratings confusion

J41721
Posts: 59 Forumite

Hi all
I am viewing 2 houses, they are similar size, 2 storeys, 3 bedroom semi-detached.
Their EPC rating differs a lot but I can't figure out why, house 1 has thicker loft insulation but then it has higher primary energy use.
I wonder how they calculate this.
J
House 1 - rating E - 40, potential C-75
The primary energy use for this property per year is 400 kilowatt hours per square metre (kWh/m2).
House 2 - rating D - 62, potential B-87
The primary energy use for this property per year is 248 kilowatt hours per square metre (kWh/m2).
I am viewing 2 houses, they are similar size, 2 storeys, 3 bedroom semi-detached.
Their EPC rating differs a lot but I can't figure out why, house 1 has thicker loft insulation but then it has higher primary energy use.
I wonder how they calculate this.
J
House 1 - rating E - 40, potential C-75
Feature | Description | Rating |
---|---|---|
Wall | Solid brick, as built, no insulation (assumed) | Very poor |
Roof | Pitched, 250 mm loft insulation | Good |
Window | Fully double glazed | Average |
Main heating | Boiler and radiators, mains gas | Good |
Main heating control | Programmer, room thermostat and TRVs | Good |
Hot water | From main system | Average |
Lighting | Low energy lighting in 55% of fixed outlets | Good |
Floor | Suspended, no insulation (assumed) | N/A |
Secondary heating | Room heaters, mains gas | N/A |
House 2 - rating D - 62, potential B-87
Feature | Description | Rating |
---|---|---|
Wall | Solid brick, as built, no insulation (assumed) | Very poor |
Roof | Pitched, 75 mm loft insulation | Average |
Window | Fully double glazed | Average |
Main heating | Boiler and radiators, mains gas | Good |
Main heating control | Programmer, room thermostat and TRVs | Good |
Hot water | From main system | Good |
Lighting | Low energy lighting in 60% of fixed outlets | Good |
Floor | Suspended, no insulation (assumed) | N/A |
Secondary heating | None | N/A |
0
Comments
-
EPCs are notoriously unreliable. They depend on an assessor having done a brief superficial training session, mostly focussed on how to input figures into the computer that generates the report (as opposed to learning to be a surveyor....).Many of the figures they input are 'assumed' (guessed).Even those that are not 'assumed' are often wrong.If you want a good idea of how the property is constructed, what energy efficient measures exist etc, have a survey done and speak to your surveyor.0
-
canaldumidi said:EPCs are notoriously unreliable. They depend on an assessor having done a brief superficial training session, mostly focussed on how to input figures into the computer that generates the report (as opposed to learning to be a surveyor....).Many of the figures they input are 'assumed' (guessed).Even those that are not 'assumed' are often wrong.If you want a good idea of how the property is constructed, what energy efficient measures exist etc, have a survey done and speak to your surveyor.There is a detached house not far from me. The EPC (now expired) had the property described as being timber framed. It is in fact, solid brick like all the other houses near by.If you want a better indicator of energy usage, ask the vendor how much gas/electricity they use, and what sort of temperature the keep the place heated to. Hard data will always trump a wet finger in the air & guesswork using "averages".
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1 -
Unless the EPC’s were done by the same person, I doubt the energy usage estimations are comparable.0
-
I used to live in a flat ground floor flat rated E. Flat above us was rated C. The only differences were we had energy efficiency bulbs, flat above didn't. We got marked down for no roof insulation, flat above didn't because there was another flat above it.
Load of nonsense.
0 -
I would not consider a house now worse than EPC C.If you buy anything worse, you are gambling that someone is going to give you a grant to update it WHEN it needs updating.I still maintain a house with a poor EPC should be worth less to reflect the work needed to bring it up to a decent standard.I don't know why the EPC does not just quote the actual energy usage as measured by your gas bill?0
-
I don't know why the EPC does not just quote the actual energy usage as measured by your gas bill?
EPC rating for my house is quite good considering the age of the house, but it doesn't seem to account for the fact most of the heat goes straight up the chimney and there's a constant cold draught at ankle level!0 -
ProDave said:I don't know why the EPC does not just quote the actual energy usage as measured by your gas bill?
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards