We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Neighbour has my parcels - what can I do??
Comments
-
No, you're getting confused with the law about opening mail which isn't addressed to your address (which is only an offence if you do so while "intending to act to a person's detriment and without reasonable excuse"). None of that affects the normal offences of theft, fraud etc which you might commit with the mail received. So it is a criminal offence to keep the stuff and deny all knowledge when the owner pops round (albeit, as above, not one the cops are likely to get very excited about).Carrot007 said:user1977 said:
It's not an offence to open the items, but that doesn't mean you're allowed to steal the contents!Carrot007 said:The other repluies seem to miss the impoprtant point here IMO.They were delivered to the correct address, the name does not form part of the address, you are allowed to open any mail delivered to your addressI think that was covered in the harm/detriment point.
The OP does also have a civil claim.0 -
The courier has done their job so no issues with their service.
The problem is between the OP and the neighbour.
@AdaF if you have proof that the parcels were indeed delivered to your neighbour (photo evidence from courier?), and the neighbour is refusing to hand them over, then personally I would write a letter to the neighbour, giving evidence that the parcels were delivered in error to their address, and asking them nicely to bring them by your house in the next 4 days. Say that as they were Christmas gifts and the sender does not have the means to replace them, then if they do not return them, you will be reporting the matter to the police as theft, and taking them to court for the sum of £XXX which is the cost to replace the goods inside the parcels.
When you say you contacted the neighbour, have you actually spoken to them in person, as you only mention a note? I would be round their house until I spoke to them in person, recording the conversation discretely just in case that could be useful.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)2 -
Have the couriers actually got proof of delivery that shows they were delivered to the right house? A picture of the door or whatever? If it were only one parcel it could very easily have been delivered wrongly - or left on the doorstep and stolen or otherwise gone astray. Do both houses have the same post code? If they don't and post code and number don't match then misdelivery becomes even more likely.
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0 -
Is there a chance the neighbour has returned the parcels to sender, therefore no longer has them?0
-
Well, according to the occupant the courier hasnt done their job as the neighbour says they've not received the parcels. If they'd support putting a claim in for non-delivery is a separate matter.pinkshoes said:The courier has done their job so no issues with their service.1 -
That's true... but what are the odds of 4 different couriers with 4 parcels all claiming to have delivered and the neighbour claims he hasn't received any.Sandtree said:
Well, according to the occupant the courier hasnt done their job as the neighbour says they've not received the parcels. If they'd support putting a claim in for non-delivery is a separate matter.pinkshoes said:The courier has done their job so no issues with their service.
It would have said on the tracking if they had been returned due to wrong address.
If there is any photo evidence of an open door and the parcel inside... Our Hermes driver takes photos. I have to remember to wear my best socks when I open the door!Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Do we know that for a fact? I'm not sure we do, hence why I have tagged the OP in my previous reply.pinkshoes said:
That's true... but what are the odds of 4 different couriers with 4 parcels all claiming to have delivered and the neighbour claims he hasn't received any.Jenni x0 -
The OP has already edited their post to clarify that was in fact the case.Jenni_D said:
Do we know that for a fact? I'm not sure we do, hence why I have tagged the OP in my previous reply.pinkshoes said:
That's true... but what are the odds of 4 different couriers with 4 parcels all claiming to have delivered and the neighbour claims he hasn't received any.1 -
Thanks - I hadn't spotted the edit.
In which case this does seem like suspicious behaviour by the neighbour.Jenni x0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



