We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
NHS afc banding within trust advice
Options
Comments
-
Have a look....://www.nhsemployers.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/anatomical-pathology-profiles.pdf0
-
I'm sure you'll work the beginning of the link out.0
-
arctic_ghost said:Workload doesn't factor into it. I'll try and have a look at the role and if there is a similar profile to match a higher band (likely be later this evening).
The title is not even the same anymore! 😆0 -
Within this context job titles are meaningless.
Has your unite steward got direct experience of matching panels, what are their thoughts on the situation?
Put you attn on getting sight of the matched job reports, thats where your evidence is likely to be found.0 -
arctic_ghost said:Within this context job titles are meaningless.
Has your unite steward got direct experience of matching panels, what are their thoughts on the situation?
Put you attn on getting sight of the matched job reports, thats where your evidence is likely to be found.
I will ask him regarding matching panels0 -
rcast1989 said:Are matched job reports done at trust level? Bu job matching I assume you mean job evaluation as I see these used to describe the same thing ?
Try and find out which trade union leads on the staff side for matching panels and make contact with one of them (there is a chance its not a unite steward) over a coffee and discus your concern and ask how to progress for best chance outcome.1 -
Would the other places be convenient to work?
Moving may be one easy way to get the higher band.
1 -
I overlooked to mention an important aspect, consistancy checking. Ask you rep about taking this up.
0 -
arctic_ghost said:I overlooked to mention an important aspect, consistancy checking. Ask you rep about taking this up.
what is that
0 -
Checkers look for inconsistancies on matching panel outcomes and if found refer the process back to the original panel.Have a look on Google, I'm pushed for time atm.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards