📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Millions of taxpayers cash to keep Bulb going

Options
12357

Comments

  • I think we're all agreed that there was never any real possibility of people being cut off without the government resolving it. To suggest otherwise is a little absurd.

    Part of the interesting thing about the demise of bulb is that, if i understood correctly, they provided only variable tariffs (correct me if i'm wrong!). So, no cheap fixes that they couldn't sustain as gas prices went up. Presumably, all their tariffs have already gone up to meet the ofgem price cap?

    So, from a government perspective its simpler to keep bulb going with its existing customers and systems, than it is to (presumably pay) suppliers of last resort to take the customers over on effectively the same tariff they're already paying.
  • QrizB
    QrizB Posts: 18,474 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    itswinter said:
    So, from a government perspective its simpler to keep bulb going with its existing customers and systems, than it is to (presumably pay) suppliers of last resort to take the customers over on effectively the same tariff they're already paying.
    Yes, exactly that.
    N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
    2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.
    Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.
    Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!
  • t0rt0ise
    t0rt0ise Posts: 4,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 October 2023 at 9:41PM
    Quote:

    There were only six electricity disconnections for debt and, for the first time since we started recording data on disconnections, in 2018 there were no gas disconnections for debt. This is again a considerable decrease compared to 2017 when 17 customers were disconnected for debt. There have been no disconnections for debt for gas and electricity in either Scotland or Wales. All six disconnections for debt occurred in England. We are very pleased to see this reduction in gas disconnections for debt from a peak of 5,727 disconnections in 2007. Unquote

    Source: Ofgem

    No one is going to authorise SoLRs or Administrators to turn off a supply when the sole aim of the SoLR/Administration process is to keep the lights on after a supplier failure. Suppliers now elect for pre-payment meters when there are unresolved debt issues.
    No no no 1.7m people risked being cut off apparently!
    Emma, reading for understanding not your forte then. Never mind.
  • Rich2808
    Rich2808 Posts: 1,387 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Gerry1 said:
    Rich2808 said:

    That is why they have stepped in - because the free market has failed!
    IIRC Bulb went bust not because the free market failed but because Ofgem forced them to trade at a loss by capping their standard variable tariff, the only tariff that they offered.
    Weren't all these suppliers aware of the rules and regulations when they entered the market?

    Plenty of other suppliers haven't collapsed.
  • Rich2808
    Rich2808 Posts: 1,387 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 22 November 2021 at 5:49PM
    itswinter said:
    I think we're all agreed that there was never any real possibility of people being cut off without the government resolving it. To suggest otherwise is a little absurd.

    Part of the interesting thing about the demise of bulb is that, if i understood correctly, they provided only variable tariffs (correct me if i'm wrong!). So, no cheap fixes that they couldn't sustain as gas prices went up. Presumably, all their tariffs have already gone up to meet the ofgem price cap?

    So, from a government perspective its simpler to keep bulb going with its existing customers and systems, than it is to (presumably pay) suppliers of last resort to take the customers over on effectively the same tariff they're already paying.

    Agreed - so can we move on from this academic debate!

    The Government would never let any one to be cut off - end of discussion - which is why they would step in as the funder/banker/supplier of last resort! Effectively Bulb is now a government owned and bankrolled entity - in all but name/formal legal terms. 

  • t0rt0ise
    t0rt0ise Posts: 4,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Rich2808 said:
    Gerry1 said:
    Rich2808 said:

    That is why they have stepped in - because the free market has failed!
    IIRC Bulb went bust not because the free market failed but because Ofgem forced them to trade at a loss by capping their standard variable tariff, the only tariff that they offered.
    Weren't all these suppliers aware of the rules and regulations when they entered the market?

    Plenty of other suppliers haven't collapsed.
    22 have though.
  • Rich2808 said:
    Gerry1 said:
    Rich2808 said:

    That is why they have stepped in - because the free market has failed!
    IIRC Bulb went bust not because the free market failed but because Ofgem forced them to trade at a loss by capping their standard variable tariff, the only tariff that they offered.
    Weren't all these suppliers aware of the rules and regulations when they entered the market?

    Plenty of other suppliers haven't collapsed.
    If the true cost of selling energy to a customer is more than that which can be charged by the company, then they will be losing money. Sustain that situation long enough, and any supplier would go bust. i think the only difference is that some suppliers stave it off longer than others through having larger cash reserves or having insurance policies against such events, but i don't think it's a situation that even the best run supplier could weather indefinitely.
  • Rich2808 said:
    Weren't all these suppliers aware of the rules and regulations when they entered the market?

    Plenty of other suppliers haven't collapsed.
    I'd suggest that yes, they were, but realistically nobody ever thought that there was a significant likelihood of this current situation occurring. Also in some  (many?) cases suppliers (for want of a better word to use for them) came into  being before the days of the price cap, so their assumption may well  have been that if wholesale prices increased, they would simply increase their retail price accordingly - something which they now cannot do, of course.
    🎉 MORTGAGE FREE (First time!) 30/09/2016 🎉 And now we go again…New mortgage taken 01/09/23 🏡
    Balance as at 01/09/23 = £115,000.00 Balance as at 31/12/23 = £112,000.00
    Balance as at 31/08/24 = £105,400.00 Balance as at 31/12/24 = £102,500.00
    £100k barrier broken 1/4/25
    SOA CALCULATOR (for DFW newbies): SOA Calculator
    she/her
  • Looks like only the large suppliers with huge cash reserves or backing will survive. So the suppliers we’ll be left with aren’t the best ones. Just the best funded.

    These companies will be losing nearly a £1,000 per customer, and when you have a million customers that’s a huge amount to lose. Especially when the average industry profit margin has been negative the last couple of years
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.