We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Lloyds banking group closing accounts - cifas?

13

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 25 November 2021 at 7:43PM
    Have they told you that you need to clear the balance in 60 days? 


  • Yes otherwise it goes to collections and I can set up an arrangement with them?
  • kaMelo
    kaMelo Posts: 2,903 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 November 2021 at 9:50PM
    Yes otherwise it goes to collections and I can set up an arrangement with them?
    They can't do that. The terms of your credit card are not the same as a current account and laid out are very specific reasons they can close the account, usually because you've breached something.
    Whilst there will be something along the lines of a business decision allowing them to close the account, unless you've breached their terms that allow them to do so, if you're carrying a balance they can only close the account to new spending. What they cannot do is change the terms to disadvantage you in paying back a balance you have run up under previous terms. 

    Absent of a clear breach of the terms by you, you can just carry on paying off the 0% balance as normal until it's cleared, only at that point can close the account entirely.
  • Daliah
    Daliah Posts: 3,792 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    The Lloyds credit card terms are a bit ambiguous about the repayment but if they have suggested an arrangement with their collection department, and this arrangement is no less favourable than your existing credit card repayment terms, that should be fine.


  • Daliah said:
    The Lloyds credit card terms are a bit ambiguous about the repayment but if they have suggested an arrangement with their collection department, and this arrangement is no less favourable than your existing credit card repayment terms, that should be fine.


    It's not ambiguous at all.  All they're saying with point 2 is that you have to repay the full balance, giving notice to close by either party doesn't mean the debt is wiped.

    However collections need to abide by the original T&C's, that's right. So if the OP has 0% until whatever date they do need to keep to this, and collections can't demand more than the minimum contractual repayment so that's a bit of a red-herring too.
  • Daliah
    Daliah Posts: 3,792 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Of course the debt won’t be wiped . Nobody suggested that it would be. The question is over when the repayment is due. 
  • Daliah said:
    Of course the debt won’t be wiped . Nobody suggested that it would be. The question is over when the repayment is due. 
    But you highlighted the part where it says "1. you will not be able to make any transactions and must destroy the cards, cancel any recurring or future-dated transaction instructions and repay your full balance 2. the agreement will continue until you have repaid all amounts you owe us."

    And then you say the repayment terms are "a bit ambiguous."  So, since I'm an idiot, please point out where the ambiguity is in any of that.


  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,312 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Daliah said:
    Of course the debt won’t be wiped . Nobody suggested that it would be. The question is over when the repayment is due. 
    But you highlighted the part where it says "1. you will not be able to make any transactions and must destroy the cards, cancel any recurring or future-dated transaction instructions and repay your full balance 2. the agreement will continue until you have repaid all amounts you owe us."

    And then you say the repayment terms are "a bit ambiguous."  So, since I'm an idiot, please point out where the ambiguity is in any of that.


    "repay your full balance" could be interpreted as meaning "repay your full balance immediately" given that is it stated in the same sentence as actions you *do* have to do right away ("destroy the cards, cancel any recurring or future-dated transaction instructions").  It is poorly worded.
  • pokora
    pokora Posts: 190 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    If your work environment allow you to carry it, I would suggest you get this:



    as a complement of the new bank you need to find.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    100 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 December 2021 at 5:30PM
    Hi everyone,

    first post here and I know similar has been posted before but could not find the final outcome.

    long sorry cut it short, I received a text message saying my accounts will be closed in 60 days. When I rang up they said for ordering too many replacement cards (I have but nothing too extreme). Anyway, I wondered would like be reported to cifas? The lady on the phone said she would highlight concerns to other banks.
    I have requested a SAR for CIFAS and is currently blank.

    my questions are:
    1. if a Cifas marker was added when will it show?
    2. How would banks highlight concerns to other banks?

    Thank you 
    CIFAS markers are just not put on there for nothing and it's quite rare that a financial provider these days would just decide to "put one on there" out of the blue because something looked dodgy, there has to be a burden of proof. 

    Previously it was the opposite and financial providers where applying them willy nilly without following correct procedures, that practice has now ended and CIFAS members are now only allowed to load information on there when A a provable criminal offence has been committed and B where it can be deemed reasonably certain the first party has been involved. 

    For example Barclay's had loaded information about me onto N Hunter a few years ago suggesting that I attempted to open a bank account with a false identity document with a false address simply because I used a driving license with a previous address that I lived at to show as ID in the branch, this was obviously wrong as the document itself was not false, and nor was the address itself, the marker was eventually removed by N Hunter as Barclays themselves refused to do so, however it did not result in a cifas marker as Barclays clearly did not have any evidence to suggest that identity document I provided was in fact "false" and therefore the evidential standard for applying a CIFAS marker was not met.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.