📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Understanding Investment Fees

2

Comments

  • tebbins
    tebbins Posts: 773 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper
    You don't need to keep your eye on the ball or "watch" anything. It's more a matter of getting the admin right at the start and not doing anything stupid like logging in every day, changing what you own, getting emotionally attached, selling in a crash etc.
    You could try the IFA for a year, learn, grow your knowledge, see how that goes then consider leaving them (see if they have any withdrawal penalties etc.) if you feel confident and don't feel that the service is value for money.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,525 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    longman27 said:
    From the figures quoted here we could save £5000 a year in fees but would have to take responsibility for watching the investment. £5k is a lot of money but if we take our eye off the ball we could lose more or if we do lose through the advisor we would not have the false satisfaction of being able to 'blame' the professional.
    Something to think about. Thanks for all the input.
    The whole point of huge multi-asset funds like LifeStrategy is that they're geared up for 'fire and forget' investors who are looking for something easy and simple, so there really isn't anything significant involved in 'watching the investment'.  That's not to say that you shouldn't periodically review if it's still meeting your requirements, but it's unlikely to be as intimidating a prospect as you might imagine, and, as pointed out sometimes on here, professional advisers don't hold responsibility for investment performance as such anyway....
  • So here is a breakdown of fees quoted-
    Initial charge 2.17%
    On going charges-
    Advisor Planning advice charge 0.75%
    Standard Life WRAP 0.29%
    SEI Growth Sterling Wealth Acc 1.38%
    Vanguard Life Strategy 80% Equity A 0.26%

    My CSE grade 1 Maths tells me that that is more than 1.86%. I'll check that with the advisor.



  • Missy79
    Missy79 Posts: 217 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 18 November 2021 at 2:41PM
    I've recently set up a Vanguard account and it was very straightforward.
    Assuming you are happy with the Lifestrategy 80 then the approx annual fees on £300000 would be:
    Platform: 0.15% capped at £375 annually for your £300000
    Fund: 0.22%, so £660 annually 
    Total: £1035

    If your quoted amounts above are correct they also seem to have added 0.04% to the fund charge
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 18 November 2021 at 2:50PM
    longman27 said:
    SEI Growth Sterling Wealth Acc 1.38%
    Vanguard Life Strategy 80% Equity A 0.26%
    These are 2 different funds so you don't add them up but apply them to whatever proportions of money they are allocated. For example if the advisor is saying the ongoing total is 1.86% then a 50% weighting to each fund would be an average fund cost of 0.82% plus the 0.75% and 0.29% ongoing = 1.86%
    Missy79 said:
    If your quoted amounts above are correct they also seem to have added 0.04% to the fund charge
    They have included the 0.04% disclosed internal transaction costs for VLS80 see PDF
    https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/content/documents/legal/vanguard-full-fund-costs-and-charges.pdf
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,167 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 18 November 2021 at 3:01PM
    longman27 said:
    So here is a breakdown of fees quoted-
    Initial charge 2.17%
    On going charges-
    Advisor Planning advice charge 0.75%
    Standard Life WRAP 0.29%
    SEI Growth Sterling Wealth Acc 1.38%
    Vanguard Life Strategy 80% Equity A 0.26%

    My CSE grade 1 Maths tells me that that is more than 1.86%. I'll check that with the advisor.



    If you take out the SEI growth fund and work on everything being in VLS80 , the total cost would be 1.3% . The high cost of the SEI Growth fund is pushing up the overall cost .

    From the figures quoted here we could save £5000 a year in fees

    Probably that would be a maximum saving . More realistically it would be in the £3K region +/- £1K
  • IanManc
    IanManc Posts: 2,466 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Missy79 said:
    I've recently set up a Vanguard account and it was very straightforward.
    Assuming you are happy with the Lifestrategy 80 then the approx annual fees on £300000 would be:
    Platform: 0.15% capped at £375 annually for your £300000
    Fund: 0.22%, so £660 annually 
    Total: £1035

    If your quoted amounts above are correct they also seem to have added 0.04% to the fund charge
    If you wanted to invest the entire £300k in VLS80 then you could open an account with Iweb for a one off £100 fee, transfer the money to them and invest the lot at one go for a £5 fee.

    The platform costs in Year 1 would be: £100 + £5 = £105.

    In Year 2 onwards the platform costs would be £0.

    The 0.22% fund charge is taken from the fund internally by Vanguard. You don't pay it yourself or actually see it, and it is the same wherever your holding is held, so from the point of view of calculating a comparison of what you're paying out yourself in fees in cash you can just ignore it.

    Iweb is owned by Halifax Share Dealing and is part of Lloyds Banking Group, so is very safe.

    You also need to decide if you want the Accumulation or Income version of the fund.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,849 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Advisor Planning advice charge 0.75%
    Not unreasonable for £300k.  You could get 0.50% shopping around but that is fine.

    Standard Life WRAP 0.29%
    Not as good as Standard Life Elevate which would be 0.25% on standard terms.    Aviva would offer special terms on £300k that would see them probably in the 0.1x% range.        Aviva can be a bit of pain with service (during lockdowns, they turned off their phone lines) and their software is not as good as either Wrap or Elevate (all three use FNZ.  Indeed, Aviva use a newer version.  But Aviva lock down the configuration more and have virtually no audit trails on display).  I position Aviva as a budget option for those that place cost above service.  However, Elevate is just as good as Wrap.  So, I would question the platform use by asking why an IFA, who can use any platform, is choosing to use Wrap over Elevate when they do the same thing and Elevate is cheaper.


    SEI Growth Sterling Wealth Acc 1.38%
    Vanguard Life Strategy 80% Equity A 0.26%
    A bit basic for £300k but if your knowledge and understanding are not strong and you are not an experienced investor then starting with simple options is sometimes the best way.

    It could make the annual CGT allowance a bit more difficult as well.  The use of single sector funds in a GIA can give a bit more control compared to multi-asset but it depends on the tax wrappers being used.

    If your quoted amounts above are correct they also seem to have added 0.04% to the fund chargeNo.  You quoted the charges incorrectly by only showing the platform charge and the OCF.  You ignored the TC.   The TC on VLS is 0.04%.
    Advisers include all charges in their disclosures.  As do Vanguard when they issue their cost and charges disclosure.





    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 18 November 2021 at 3:29PM
    dunstonh said:
    It could make the annual CGT allowance a bit more difficult as well.  The use of single sector funds in a GIA can give a bit more control compared to multi-asset but it depends on the tax wrappers being used.
    Yes I am assuming as part of the service the advisor would be gradually uninvesting and transferring money each tax year out of the unwrapped GIA accounts to invest in the OP (and their wife's) S&S ISAs and pensions making good use of annual contribution allowances. In such circumstances I would want to hold at least seperate equity and bond funds in order to optimise the sequence of the assets being moved to reduce income tax and capital gains tax risk on the unwrapped accounts.
  • Alexland said:
    longman27 said:
    SEI Growth Sterling Wealth Acc 1.38%
    Vanguard Life Strategy 80% Equity A 0.26%
    These are 2 different funds so you don't add them up but apply them to whatever proportions of money they are allocated. For example if the advisor is saying the ongoing total is 1.86% then a 50% weighting to each fund would be an average fund cost of 0.82% plus the 0.75% and 0.29% ongoing = 1.86%
    Missy79 said:
    If your quoted amounts above are correct they also seem to have added 0.04% to the fund charge
    They have included the 0.04% disclosed internal transaction costs for VLS80 see PDF
    https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/content/documents/legal/vanguard-full-fund-costs-and-charges.pdf

    Thanks Alexland you are correct its 1.86%
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.