We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Dividend vs growth stocks?
Comments
-
He was a visionary: I wonder what happened to him and the funds he ran?Thrugelmir said:
Woodford became a star for making the right calls and seeing through the hype. A disciple of Buffet.Linton said:
Really. 20 years ago people were saying the opposite - tortoise and hare.Malkytheheed said:Growth always outperforms Dividend over time
0 -
He made lots of money for a lot of people and then er.. got sacked.Worried_fool said:
He was a visionary: I wonder what happened to him and the funds he ran?Thrugelmir said:
Woodford became a star for making the right calls and seeing through the hype. A disciple of Buffet.Linton said:
Really. 20 years ago people were saying the opposite - tortoise and hare.Malkytheheed said:Growth always outperforms Dividend over time0 -
His investors are still trying to recoup their money I think through a group action.0
-
Not a visionary. Sometimes investors just don't see or realise the obvious. Different funds , different era a decade or so on.Worried_fool said:
He was a visionary: I wonder what happened to him and the funds he ran?Thrugelmir said:
Woodford became a star for making the right calls and seeing through the hype. A disciple of Buffet.Linton said:
Really. 20 years ago people were saying the opposite - tortoise and hare.Malkytheheed said:Growth always outperforms Dividend over time0 -
To be fair to the equity income category, Woodford was investing in things that clearly did not fall into that category.
2 -
Will the investors have had the FSCS 85K protection?0
-
Woodford finally left Perpertual in 2014 to start his own fund management business. That's when matters started going wrong.tebbins said:To be fair to the equity income category, Woodford was investing in things that clearly did not fall into that category.1 -
There's something amiss with the valuation and sale of some of the unquoted portfolio. Link have questions to answer. Not least that investors that are being advised by Woodford bought the stakes.Prism said:
What for? The fund didn't collapse at the end. It just had some relatively poor performance, was closed and shut down. Funds shut all the time.AsifM068 said:Will the investors have had the FSCS 85K protection?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
