We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No completion certificate for extension
Options
Comments
-
user1977 said:ChilliBob said:
From what I know the indemnity insurance would cover a fine, not building costs?
Formal enforcement would be via an Enforcement Notice (S172). Once the notice period has expired, and no successful appeal has been made, non-compliance with the notice is an offence (S179).
Conviction for a S179 offence places the offender at risk of an unlimited fine - the amount being determined in part by the financial benefit derived from the offence.
The LA can also then secure a Confiscation Order under the Proceeds of Crime Act to recover the financial benefit the offender made.
E.g. Build a house without planning consent and ignore an Enforcement Notice, there is a potential risk of having the house confiscated.
It is fairly unusual for things to go that far though (people usually see sense far sooner) and it isn't something that ChilliBob needs to worry about in relation to the example he gave. (unless there's a listed building or conservation area involved)
0 -
ChilliBob said:
So you guys seem to be suggesting that costs of rebuilding would be covered, if necessary, and due to some 4 year rule, are highly unlikely to come into play anyway.
As above though, such scenarios are incredibly rare, so I wouldn't expect to find many practical examples of what happens in practice!0 -
Well it seems they did have people visit during construction, which is encouraging, so, fingers crossed we can get it signed off.0
-
ChilliBob said:Well it seems they did have people visit during construction, which is encouraging, so, fingers crossed we can get it signed off.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards