BW Legal/ UK parking Patrol (again!)

Matt138

Coupon-mad said:

You din't have 14 days to pay up if there are grounds to appeal.  You don't pay if appealing; but it will cost you some up front fees instead.

I could be wrong but I believe even when you are appealing the order it still stands and judgment would be entered as normal? There has to be a good reason to suspend an order/judgment on appeal beyond simply the appeal itself and needs to be supported by evidence.

Likely best to still pay to comply with the Order just in case the appeal isn't success. Losing the appeal won't give you a fresh 14 days. 

Jenni_D

If the OP contacts Contestor immediately I'm sure they'll be able to properly advise them whether they should still pay the judgment ... and this will be in plenty of time within the 14 days.  

moneylion

Coupon-mad said:

You din't have 14 days to pay up if there are grounds to appeal.  You don't pay if appealing; but it will cost you some up front fees instead.

Jackson will let you know if he sees grounds.

Did you ever see the 137 page bundle? 

What did she say about the POFA 2012?

This looks like an error:

"The judge also did not allow me to contest the claimants final statement which she said she wouldnt but i thought was a bit unfair as a litigant in person because they raised some incorrect points."

Ask Jackson about that refusal. 

Never saw the 137 page bundle. I did ask how do I know what to rely on? She said there has been enough time and you have received the papers. 

She said POFA  part of the defence doesnt apply because you have admitted to being a driver. 

She asked me to put all my defence final statement together which I did. The claimant then refuted some of my points and put forward a few incorrect ones as part of his 'final statement'. When I tried to refute, the judge said I had had my turn in my 'final' statement. 

moneylion

Jenni_D said:

If the OP contacts Contestor immediately I'm sure they'll be able to properly advise them whether they should still pay the judgment ... and this will be in plenty of time within the 14 days.  

Have emailed contestor just now and will give them a chance to consider before calling them. Thanks for all the help. really do appreciate it. 

Matt138

Coupon-mad said:

Matt138 said:

Coupon-mad said:

You din't have 14 days to pay up if there are grounds to appeal.  You don't pay if appealing; but it will cost you some up front fees instead.

I could be wrong but I believe even when you are appealing the order it still stands and judgment would be entered as normal? There has to be a good reason to suspend an order/judgment on appeal beyond simply the appeal itself and needs to be supported by evidence.

Likely best to still pay to comply with the Order just in case the appeal isn't success. Losing the appeal won't give you a fresh 14 days. 

Likely best to see what Jackson Yamba thinks.

It's not gone unnoticed that there's been a concerning pattern in your previous posts on this board (almost all deleted or hidden now for some reason?) where IIRC, you have told people they should pay private PCNs and that they are in the wrong.

We respectfully disagree. Adamantly.

I don't think I've told anyone to pay beyond the above or even commented that much. Is there a way to check what comments and stuff I've made before? When I click my profile it says I've started multiple threads and posts but I can't view any of them and I've started not even made a thread at all.

Is it a setting I've enabled do you know?

Only mentioned it in this one since there was a judgment involved and appealing a Judgment doesn't normally stay the judgment.

Coupon-mad

I don't know why your profile would show threads and posts that don't exist I'm afraid.  

My post was based on recollection (hence I caveated it with "IIRC") but if I've remembered wrong I'm happy to delete it and let's just wait and see if Contestor Legal can see grounds to help this victim.

Seems to be the case from their report about what the Judge said, that this poster has never seen the 137 page bundle that BW were ordered to serve in 2023 and then was further wronged by being told they could not respond to BW's 'later submission'.

Odd, and unjust. Looks a possible for appeal but I wouldn't presume to tell a Defendant to pay what's been ordered when we know they are looking into appealing and will get good advice from Contestor Legal.