We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New build flats (only 4 years old), owners charged with £425,000 repairs, no insurance
Options
Comments
-
mertywerty said:
We also do feel £425k is excessively expensive, as the original report stated that they did not expect the entire repairs to be more than the excess on the warranty (£104k), and therefore there was no point claiming on the warranty.- A different contractor would do the same job more cheaply
- The job could be carried out more cheaply (e.g. Scaffolding on 3 sides instead of 4)
- Cheaper materials could be used (e.g. PVC drainage pipes instead of stainless steel)
The fact that it's 'a lot of money' or 'more expensive than the estimate' isn't really a legitimate basis for challenging the cost.
3 -
Do let us know how you get on with this. I am speechless that you seem to have no redress for buying a flat in a building that was constructed so badly. How could anyone insure against this happening ?2
-
mertywerty said:
We also do feel £425k is excessively expensive, as the original report stated that they did not expect the entire repairs to be more than the excess on the warranty (£104k), and therefore there was no point claiming on the warranty.
I'm not sure how a professional person who did the survey could get the estimated costs out by a factor of 4 times!
Perhaps the initial estimate was the one that was wrong, and further investigation has revealed more work required?
This is the best value of the three quotes. What were the other quotes? If they were lower, why was this deemed best value?
And if there's £104k of excess on a claim, which would cover the rest of the expenditure, why isn't that route being taken?0 -
I thought new buildings come with a mandatory 10 year warranty against defects?
0 -
NameUnavailable said:I thought new buildings come with a mandatory 10 year warranty against defects?0
-
NameUnavailable said:I thought new buildings come with a mandatory 10 year warranty against defects?
I've just had a thought. CRL rang a faint bell. Wasn't that the warranty provider whose underwriter went under a few years ago, leaving warranties un-backed and useless?
Yes - it was...
https://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/crl-seeks-to-draw-line-under-underwriter-failure
Where did that end up? OP - was Alpha your underwriter?0 -
NameUnavailable said:I thought new buildings come with a mandatory 10 year warranty against defects?0
-
AdrianC said:NameUnavailable said:I thought new buildings come with a mandatory 10 year warranty against defects?
I've just had a thought. CRL rang a faint bell. Wasn't that the warranty provider whose underwriter went under a few years ago, leaving warranties un-backed and useless?
Yes - it was...
https://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/crl-seeks-to-draw-line-under-underwriter-failure
Where did that end up? OP - was Alpha your underwriter?
CRL used 2 underwriters - Alpha and CGICE.
The OP refers to "CRL/CGICE" in their first post - so it seems CGICE is their underwriter.
The OP also mentions that the management company has discussed the issues with the warranty insurers - so it wouldn't be Alpha.
(Going off topic - property owners with Alpha underwritten policies had to pay out big sums of money to buy policies from other insurers, when Alpha went bust. The OP would probably remember the pain of having to pay out a few grand, if it happened to them - or making the decision not to get insurance.)
2 -
This sort of "surprise bill" stuff is going on all over the country, the guy in this article isn`t paying as much as the OP but still it is the last sort of expense he needs at this time.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58747051
1 -
user1977 said:NameUnavailable said:I thought new buildings come with a mandatory 10 year warranty against defects?It was kind of a rhetorical question as I have heard/read before that NHBC warranty isn't worth the paper it's written on!I looked at a new build place last year and there was some unfinished parts of the building and shockingly bad construction - I pointed a few things out to the sales rep who assured me that it would all be done properly before 'sign off' and not to worry as I would have a 10 year g'tee as well!!!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards