We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Deprivation of assets
Options
Comments
-
Alice_Holt said:What other benefits do you receive apart from HB ? Child tax credits and that’s it.
Are you in receipt of Tax Credits? Child tax credits
HB is means tested, so potentially subject to the deprivation of capital test. Yes, understand this and just wondered if the surgery would be deemed as deprivation.
Tax Credits does not have capital limits, so this would not be directly affected by savings / spending of those savings.
If your HB ended you would not be able to reclaim it. You would need to look at a UC claim for help with housing costs.
Any UC claim would end your TC claim. Thank you Alice, I know this but I really appreciate you giving me facts rather than opinions and judgement.
0 -
poppy12345 said:Potentially yes but i don't think anyone can specifically give you a direct answer to that. It will be down to a decision maker to decide when you need to reclaim benefits.
1 -
poppy12345 said:poppy12345 said: IPotentially yes but i don't think anyone can specifically give you a direct answer to that. It will be down to a decision maker to decide when you need to reclaim benefits.0
-
ames1010 said:poppy12345 said:poppy12345 said: IPotentially yes but i don't think anyone can specifically give you a direct answer to that. It will be down to a decision maker to decide when you need to reclaim benefits.
As poppy says it's a judgement call of an individual HB Decision Maker, we can't foretell that decision. It is a challenge-able decision, though. You could appeal an unfavourable decision and put your case to tribunal.
https://medium.com/adviser/a-guide-to-deprivation-of-capital-income-3209a4b50720
However, if adjudged deprivation then notional capital rules would apply: https://england.shelter.org.uk/professional_resources/legal/benefits/housing_benefit/treatment_of_capital_in_housing_benefit_calculations
Your HB wouldn't end (IMO) but continue as now (with a higher tariff income assumed than that based on your actual capital).
Alice Holt Forest situated some 4 miles south of Farnham forms the most northerly gateway to the South Downs National Park.0 -
sheramber said:Well, it would mean the taxpayer was covering the cost of the surgery by paying out UC.0
-
poppy12345 said:seatbeltnoob said:I didn't even consider this to be an issue. When I read about deprivation of assets. I thought it would be something like buying gold bullions and keeping that as cash equivalents, "giving" money away to friends and family to reduce your capital. I didn't think they'd question your own consumption.
It's a luxury that many people could only ever dream of.0 -
But you are concerned about losing your housing benefit, despite the fact you say it is a small amount.
Who do you think funds that small amount if not other taxpayers.6 -
ames1010 said:poppy12345 said:seatbeltnoob said:I didn't even consider this to be an issue. When I read about deprivation of assets. I thought it would be something like buying gold bullions and keeping that as cash equivalents, "giving" money away to friends and family to reduce your capital. I didn't think they'd question your own consumption.
It's a luxury that many people could only ever dream of.
You posted a question, which i answered not once but twice with the same answer each time. I've said all i need to say so i'm out!
3 -
So you don't want opinions, only facts, but when a Decision Maker makes their decision, it will be based on their 'opinion' considering that you don't need a breast augmentation, you simply want one.
Therefore, poster's giving you their 'opinion' is helpful in trying to work out what the DM's opinion is likely to be.
As you've been told, there is no 'fact' involved so people can't give you one.
Personally, I think that the decision is likely to be that you are planning on spending a great deal of money on something you don't need in order to retain/increase the amount of benefits you receive.1 -
As a decision maker I think it would be seen as deprivation, assessors make quick decisions on the info provided. I would be looking at if there was a medical need. For example something from a health care professional recommending your need for surgery. (NHs wait times could be a reason to go private)
the same would be said about someone buying a car to deprive themselves if they buy a modest car to replace an old one that is reasonable. If they choose to buy a Porsche it becomes deprivation.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards