We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Locating owner of unregistered land
Comments
-
There might also be practical reasons why nobody has developed the land e.g. utilities underneath, or terrible ground conditions (e.g. mining if it's in the valleys).2
-
Section62 said:topoftherock said:
I don’t think this land has ever been built on, but I’d need to check old maps to confirm. Where would be the best place to find old maps?
https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/topoftherock said:
I don’t want to ask the neighbours, just in case they take my idea. (In this the case, there are only two cottages next to the land).topoftherock said:
The land is relatively flat, rectangular and I know it’s never been used for at least 30 years. There is a bus stop directly in front, but I see this is an advantage and can’t see why this would prevent building.0 -
1
-
user1977 said:There might also be practical reasons why nobody has developed the land e.g. utilities underneath, or terrible ground conditions (e.g. mining if it's in the valleys).0
-
topoftherock said:user1977 said:There might also be practical reasons why nobody has developed the land e.g. utilities underneath, or terrible ground conditions (e.g. mining if it's in the valleys).2
-
Section62 said:topoftherock said:
I actually contacted them a couple of months ago, and they told me about land that they still own locally (which didn’t include this land).
They said they’ve abandoned little bits of scattered land many years ago.
Therefore, I’m fairly confident they are the owners.
But if they’ve abandoned this land (just like many parts) does that mean it’s highly likely they’ve disposed of the paper title deeds or simply lost them?
(BiB) Sometimes people will deny owning land because they are fed up with people asking if they can buy it.
(BiI) Nothing can be inferred from them saying they have abandoned land (or don't own it). It is just as likely they don't want to discuss their private land ownership with you.
In reality, for a big estate, there won't necessarily be deeds or registrations for individual plots of land unless they have previously been sold away from the estate's ownership. If a plot of land is surrounded by land which was/is (previously) owned by the estate then it is a fair assumption that the estate still owns this bit - unless someone can prove otherwise.
"Abandoned" doesn't mean 'no longer owned' - if there is development potential for the land you can be fairly sure ownership rights will be reasserted swiftly, if challenged.1 -
topoftherock said:AdrianC said:There is no other way.
The owner may not even know they're the owner.
The owner is the person in possession of the paper title deeds.
Maybe they've been lost.
Maybe they're in a solicitor's vaults.
Maybe the last person who knew they were the owner has died and they've been inherited by somebody who doesn't know the estate they inherited included that land.
Maybe they died intestate with no heirs and the estate is bona vacantia.
Maybe they were owned by a company that went bankrupt and whose assets were passed to their main creditor, the tax man.
I actually contacted them a couple of months ago, and they told me about land that they still own locally (which didn’t include this land).
They said they’ve abandoned little bits of scattered land many years ago.
Therefore, I’m fairly confident they are the owners.
But if they’ve abandoned this land (just like many parts) does that mean it’s highly likely they’ve disposed of the paper title deeds or simply lost them?
They still own it. Perhaps they'd sell it to you, but can't find the paperwork. It's probably not actually on a separate title, just part of the same freehold as the rest of the estate.
But if you think there's value in developing it, what can you add to that that they can't just do directly? Perhaps they don't WANT that land developing?2 -
topoftherock said:user1977 said:Some context would help us provide more advice. What does the land look like? Has it ever been used for anything? Have you checked old maps? Asked the neighbours?
If it's large enough for two houses, it seems less likely that it's simply been forgotten about. Or that you're the first to think about it.
I think a lot of the land owners (usually trustees of an estate that practically owned all the local land when almost all houses had original 99-year leases) abandoned bits of land scattered around these valleys; after the vast majority of people bought their freeholds in the 80s and 90s.
I don’t think this land has ever been built on, but I’d need to check old maps to confirm. Where would be the best place to find old maps?
I don’t want to ask the neighbours, just in case they take my idea. (In this the case, there are only two cottages next to the land).
The land is relatively flat, rectangular and I know it’s never been used for at least 30 years. There is a bus stop directly in front, but I see this is an advantage and can’t see why this would prevent building.
3 -
AdrianC said:
They had so much land up until the 80s/90s I guess they couldn’t keep up with how much they had.
Another simple reason, is that nobody has ever shown an interest and contacted them, because they don’t know who owns it.
I think I will contact their solicitor, explain that there were houses on this land 50 odd years ago, and see if they can confirm it’s their land and find the paper title deeds. I would offer them a fair price, so it will definitely benefit the trust. I may not get planning permission for years, or maybe not get any at all. That’s the risks i’m wiling to take.0 -
So you're asking them to sell to you for a below-market value on the basis that they don't really need it...?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards