We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Splitting up but not married help please

Options
Hi I saw the post below on a similar theme and wondered if you could advise me for a friend please?

They are not married and splitting up. Thy have grown up children living away and a house with a mortgage he pays. She is in the house and works but low income.  He is at a friends.

Someone told her she needs to find out if they are both on the mortgage they are both on it and what sort of agreement it?

Not quite sure what this means.

Although he pays it she bailed him out of a large amount of debt when they first got together and this has not been repaid. She pays bills in house and looks after it.

So basically if they are to end it all and split up (on cards) would the house be sold and split the proceeds? Also what about the money she paid for him?

Should she see a solicitor or any advice to help. Would a mediation service help or cost to much and not be helpful?

Should she try to keep in the house? alone ie not let him back? Nobody else involved on her side - sort of dubious on his.

Any tips/ideas welcomed?

Thanks


Comments

  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 35,564 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    She needs to start by getting a copy of the deeds from the Land Registry - costs £3. Avoid the rip-off companies that charge 10 times as much to make the search for you. That will tell her whether he is the sole owner or whether she is on the deeds.


    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • qwert10
    qwert10 Posts: 188 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 10 September 2021 at 8:56AM
    thanks! any info helpful.
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,318 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Mediation might help, and Relate will see her on her own if he doesn't wish to go - that may help her work through her options and decide what SHE wants to do. 

    Eventually a solicitor may be needed but her rights in this situation are not as strong as they would be had they been married. 
    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,247 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Mediation is a good option where there is an element of fairness in how they settle up. He might have fogotten just how much debt she helped him clear, and a good mediator will be able to put this to him and hopefully arrive at a fair settlement. 

    Professional mediators charge about £100 per hour, so are a good deal cheaper than an solictor; especially as the cost of themediator can be shared. 
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • Alias_Omega
    Alias_Omega Posts: 7,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 12 September 2021 at 10:28PM
    Probably joint tenants, property should be sold and split 50/50. If no proof of debt loan agreement (i.e. not a deed, just verbal) then that's gone out of the window (as it was always in good faith) ~ Expect stuff to go sour quickly after this, become very bitter and drawn out. 

    Fast method could be to fess up what he owes, as long as it goes quickly etc. I suspect pensions will be saved, no splitting of them. 

    Once again, go see a solicitor! First 30 mins is free...
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The key issue is whose name the house is in - for unmarried couples, the starting point is that you split the house according to what it says on the deeds - so if they own as joint tenants, or as tenants in common in equal shares, then they each get 50%. 

    If they own as tenants  in common in unequal shares, they each get the share set out in their declaration of trust. 

    If the house in in his sole name then she has a much more difficult task as she would have to be able to satisfy a court (unless he agreed to a split) that there had been a mutual intention that they would both be beneficial owners, even if the title is solely in his name. This is pretty hard to prove although if she could show a paper trail of paying a lump sum towards the deposit it would help her. 

    The fact she paid his debts, or he paid the mortgage, wouldn't change the split between them unless they could prove that there has been a joint intention that it would result in an unequal split, with it being the person claiming the unequal share to prove that that was what they both agreed or intended. 
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • thanks all!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.