We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Investment Trusts / REITS for retirement income.
Comments
-
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
0 -
Personal view is that yield compression does make some types of bonds too risky. Default by the issuer will result in a 100% capital loss. As if the issuer goes under. Then bond holders are unsecured creditors. Companies rarely have sufficient realisable assets to even cover their preferential creditors.AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
Not recommendations but it's worth exploring companies that could possibly provide diversification to your portfolio whilst generating a reasonable income. Here are some examples to research and track, and open up a new world of opportunities.
Bonds NCYF, BIPS
Battery Storage GSF, GRID
Social HOME, CSH, SOHO
Themes BPCR
Other Assets GCP, INPP, HICL
Private Equity APAX
1 -
I would ignore that. ITs can pay dividends even if they don't receive them - they don't need to with-hold. The ones that do reinvest the dividends anyway and then sell capital later. Some keep the dividends and don't pay them out.The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.3 -
Thank you for this Thrugelmir.Thrugelmir said:
Personal view is that yield compression does make some types of bonds too risky. Default by the issuer will result in a 100% capital loss. As if the issuer goes under. Then bond holders are unsecured creditors. Companies rarely have sufficient realisable assets to even cover their preferential creditors.AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
Not recommendations but it's worth exploring companies that could possibly provide diversification to your portfolio whilst generating a reasonable income. Here are some examples to research and track, and open up a new world of opportunities.
Bonds NCYF, BIPS
Battery Storage GSF, GRID
Social HOME, CSH, SOHO
Themes BPCR
Other Assets GCP, INPP, HICL
Private Equity APAX0 -
Pardon my ignorance Thrugelmir; do I have to pay tax withholding fees when investing in US domiciled funds?AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir.Thrugelmir said:
Personal view is that yield compression does make some types of bonds too risky. Default by the issuer will result in a 100% capital loss. As if the issuer goes under. Then bond holders are unsecured creditors. Companies rarely have sufficient realisable assets to even cover their preferential creditors.AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
Not recommendations but it's worth exploring companies that could possibly provide diversification to your portfolio whilst generating a reasonable income. Here are some examples to research and track, and open up a new world of opportunities.
Bonds NCYF, BIPS
Battery Storage GSF, GRID
Social HOME, CSH, SOHO
Themes BPCR
Other Assets GCP, INPP, HICL
Private Equity APAX0 -
Any particular funds in mind?AsifM068 said:
Pardon my ignorance Thrugelmir; do I have to pay tax withholding fees when investing in US domiciled funds?AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir.Thrugelmir said:
Personal view is that yield compression does make some types of bonds too risky. Default by the issuer will result in a 100% capital loss. As if the issuer goes under. Then bond holders are unsecured creditors. Companies rarely have sufficient realisable assets to even cover their preferential creditors.AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
Not recommendations but it's worth exploring companies that could possibly provide diversification to your portfolio whilst generating a reasonable income. Here are some examples to research and track, and open up a new world of opportunities.
Bonds NCYF, BIPS
Battery Storage GSF, GRID
Social HOME, CSH, SOHO
Themes BPCR
Other Assets GCP, INPP, HICL
Private Equity APAX0 -
U.S. ETFS and U.S REITS; I understand that there is 30% with-holding tax fee for the U.S. markets when purchasing shares from the U.K. but I'm not sure if the with-holding tax applies to US ETFs and REITS. Can you help?Thrugelmir said:
Any particular funds in mind?AsifM068 said:
Pardon my ignorance Thrugelmir; do I have to pay tax withholding fees when investing in US domiciled funds?AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir.Thrugelmir said:
Personal view is that yield compression does make some types of bonds too risky. Default by the issuer will result in a 100% capital loss. As if the issuer goes under. Then bond holders are unsecured creditors. Companies rarely have sufficient realisable assets to even cover their preferential creditors.AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
Not recommendations but it's worth exploring companies that could possibly provide diversification to your portfolio whilst generating a reasonable income. Here are some examples to research and track, and open up a new world of opportunities.
Bonds NCYF, BIPS
Battery Storage GSF, GRID
Social HOME, CSH, SOHO
Themes BPCR
Other Assets GCP, INPP, HICL
Private Equity APAX0 -
In my experience dividend withholding tax* on US listed ETFs** is the same as with company shares but Reits, same as here, are different and the answer depends on the type of distribution.AsifM068 said:
U.S. ETFS and U.S REITS; I understand that there is 30% with-holding tax fee for the U.S. markets when purchasing shares from the U.K. but I'm not sure if the with-holding tax applies to US ETFs and REITS. Can you help?Thrugelmir said:
Any particular funds in mind?AsifM068 said:
Pardon my ignorance Thrugelmir; do I have to pay tax withholding fees when investing in US domiciled funds?AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir.Thrugelmir said:
Personal view is that yield compression does make some types of bonds too risky. Default by the issuer will result in a 100% capital loss. As if the issuer goes under. Then bond holders are unsecured creditors. Companies rarely have sufficient realisable assets to even cover their preferential creditors.AsifM068 said:
Thank you for this Thrugelmir; as very much a new / lay investor I have a lot to learn it seems yet I do have time on my side, around 7 years before retirement at 60, whilst my capital grows through my FTSE Global All Cap index tracker with Vanguard.Thrugelmir said:
You need to dig deeper into the Trust's share holdings and form your own opinion. Also quantify how much has been drawn from reserves to sustain the dividend over the years. As it's not just a question of looking for yield but whether you agree with the fund managers style. Individual companies can very quickly underperform financially or fall of favour with investors.AsifM068 said:Of all the IT's cited, has anyone heard of the Merchant's Trust for I have read that they are on AIC's list as a dividend aristocrat and yield 5%?
The thing that sounds appealing about ITs is that they can with-hold 15% of earnings to preserve future dividends to an extent and the Merchant's Trust would on the surface appear to have a good record of delivering consistent dividends with some capital growth.
Do you have any thoughts on junk / high yield bonds for income or are they too risky?
Not recommendations but it's worth exploring companies that could possibly provide diversification to your portfolio whilst generating a reasonable income. Here are some examples to research and track, and open up a new world of opportunities.
Bonds NCYF, BIPS
Battery Storage GSF, GRID
Social HOME, CSH, SOHO
Themes BPCR
Other Assets GCP, INPP, HICL
Private Equity APAX
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/08/reit-tax.asp
*15% outside a Sipp/pension if you complete a W8-BEN declaration
**This is if you're allowed to even buy them as most don't have the EU mifid/priips or whatever it's called compliant documentation2 -
I started a similar thread below, but income investing seems very out of favour at the moment:In addition to @Thrugelmir's suggestions above, here are a few of my holdings (and a couple on the watchlist):EquityCTY, HFEL, BATS, RDSB, and looking to add DLG, LGEN, NG and more BATS on price weakness. RDSB is more of a historical holding, but the dividend yield has now recovered to 4.9%, so I continue to hold it in the hope of a price recovery should oil prices surge.Infrastructure / RenewablesBSIF, FSFL, GSF, JLEN, NESF, UKWProperty REITSCSH, THRLDebt/Loans/BondsBPCR, GABI, NCYF, SEQI, TFIFI'm not a big fan of corporate bonds ATM as spreads are too tight for my liking.I looked at Hipgnosis Songs Fund (SONG), but it's too pricey/low yield for me at present, and I worry it will be a money pit of investment in the long term.I like periods of volatility that allow me to pick up new holdings, or add to existing holdings at favourable prices. A 10-15% market correction / pull back now would be great.My goal is to build a diversified investment portfolio capable of yielding 5% rising with inflation, so I am looking for yields of 5% or more, that are sustainable and capable of increasing with inflation. My portfolio currently has a forward yield of 5.97% (6.17% based on purchase price). Like you, I'm still a few years out from drawing income, and am still currently deploying assets / building the portfolio, but the plan is to draw 5% and reinvest the excess income to help sustain annual inflationary increases.Trustnet has been useful in trying to identify opportunities or other ITs / REITs by sector:
Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter0 -
Is it too risky to go all in with an Investment Trust for a retirement to supplement my pension with income dividend, and have say 25% in cash as a hedge / emergency fund0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

