We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Freehold house, resident management company

Mrsbrown21
Posts: 6 Forumite

Hi,
We are currently in the process of purchasing a 4 year old house, on a new build estate. The last apartment hasn't been sold, so the management company still run it- it will be turned over to the residents once that apartment is sold.
This is a freehold house, should we have any concerns that we will be paying 150-200 pound a year to a residents management company, apparently becoming directors? My understanding was this was to keep the road looking good, and the fences nice- the bits that nobody owns. I just want to make sure that we are not getting ourselves in a more complicated situation than that. My understanding is this is the norm for a new build estate?
Thank you for your help
0
Comments
-
It's pretty standard, yes. And that fee isn't particularly high but check the details. What is good is that the management company are handing it over to residents. Many don't and continue to fleece the residents. The law around this has not caught up with leasehold law yet.2
-
Reginald74 said:It's pretty standard, yes. And that fee isn't particularly high but check the details. What is good is that the management company are handing it over to residents. Many don't and continue to fleece the residents. The law around this has not caught up with leasehold law yet.
0 -
You need to read the deed (or other type of agreement) to see what you're committing to.
For example, if it includes contributing to the cost of repairing and maintaining roads and parking areas - on a 4 year old estate, that might just mean sweeping the leaves a few times a year, and picking up litter.
But perhaps after 10 or 15 years major expensive road repairs might be required. Maybe take a look at the things you'll be contributing to the costs of (e.g. roads, pavements, street lighting, signage, green spaces, play areas), and judge what condition they're in and whether they're likely to need expensive maintenance.
Once it's taken over by residents, things could get better or worse, depending on the mindset of those making the decisions (and/or how tightly the rules are specified.)
They might want a pristine estate, with grass verges neatly trimmed, trees regularly pruned, pavements precisely re-levelled, cracked paving replaced etc - which would work out expensive for you.
Or they might be happy with overgrown verges, unpruned trees, undulating pavements etc - because it saves them (and you) money.0 -
Just be aware you have less statutory rights than leaseholders do however given you'll have a seat at the table being directors (and should be shareholders) of the management company there shouldn't be that much risk.1
-
eddddy said:
You need to read the deed (or other type of agreement) to see what you're committing to.
For example, if it includes contributing to the cost of repairing and maintaining roads and parking areas - on a 4 year old estate, that might just mean sweeping the leaves a few times a year, and picking up litter.
But perhaps after 10 or 15 years major expensive road repairs might be required. Maybe take a look at the things you'll be contributing to the costs of (e.g. roads, pavements, street lighting, signage, green spaces, play areas), and judge what condition they're in and whether they're likely to need expensive maintenance.
Once it's taken over by residents, things could get better or worse, depending on the mindset of those making the decisions (and/or how tightly the rules are specified.)
They might want a pristine estate, with grass verges neatly trimmed, trees regularly pruned, pavements precisely re-levelled, cracked paving replaced etc - which would work out expensive for you.
Or they might be happy with overgrown verges, unpruned trees, undulating pavements etc - because it saves them (and you) money.
0 -
We had this issue with our home - took years to get it handled by the residents. However, in the end it’s just £30 a month here.1
-
I'd query becoming a director. Directors have responsibilities beyond those of a shareholder. Our freehold set up only requires us to become shareholders in the management company with an annual estate rent charge towards the upkeep of the estate road. Are all residents directors?Your solicitors should have the TR1 from the first time the house was sold or any other document "copies filed" at the Land Registry; you could ask them to email a copy to peruse or order direct from the Land Reg.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards