We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Help with Hearing Bundle !! (Set aside Default Judgment)
Comments
-
Yep, just send the part(s) that benefits you.3
-
Yes, after all you are only required to show you have good prospects of defence and this hearing is really not about the PCN, it’s about the set aside.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Hi guys, last week my CCJ was set aside successfully, woo!
Gladstone's were a no-show at the hearing. Now it is time to submit my defence. Can this be the same as the draft defence I sent already? I don't have much else to add.
Also, does anyone know how long it will take to remove it from my credit report? I want to put an offer in on a house but want to gauge when I'd finally have good credit again?
Thanks for your help so far guys.1 -
Yes it can be the same defence, and the CCJ should be removed within the month.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
Hi guys!
So Gladstones have sent me a claim form following the recent set aside of the CCJ. They have sent it by email this time instead of post. However, they have told me to sign in to defend myself via moneyclaim.gov.uk. Is this normal practice now?
Also, the password they have provided me 'XXXXX' just does not work. I have tried everything and have emailed them to let them know it does not work. Am I missing something?
Having tried to email Gladstone in the past and never receiving a reply, I am worried that I will miss the 14 days period to defend myself and a default judgement will be made again. Is this the only way to submit a defense? Please let me know if you know about this. I have added some screenshots below of the claim form.0 -
KeithP said:bbwoi said:Am I missing something?
The Issue Date on that Claim Form is 06/12/2019.
And I also within the email they have stated that they are awaiting my defence. It is surely not possible to defend this?0 -
Why isn't it possible to defend? You can certainly defend as the Judge directed, by sending the LOCAL COURT (not CCBC) and Gladstones) your defence, witness statement and evidence (a new WS about the PCN this time, see examples posted by @Nosy and @jrhys).
This is normal after a set aside and the only thing they've told you wrong is to use MCOL, which you don't after a set aside. You can't use a 2 year old password and the CCBC are not involved now anyway.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
They have added what appears to be an extra unlawful amount for debt collection. Judges have dismissed an entire claim because of this. Read this and complain to your MP.
Excel v Wilkinson
At the Bradford County Court, District Judge Claire Jackson (now HHJ Jackson, a Specialist Civil Circuit Judge) decided to hear a 'test case' a few months ago, where £60 had been added to a parking charge despite Judges up and down the country repeatedly disallowing that sum and warning parking firms not to waste court time with such spurious claims. That case was Excel v Wilkinson: G4QZ465V, heard in July 2020 and leave to appeal was refused and that route was not pursued. The Judge concluded that such claims are proceedings with 'an improper collateral purpose'. This Judge - and others who have since copied her words and struck dozens of cases out in late 2020 and into 2021 - went into significant detail and concluded that parking operators (such as this Claimant) are seeking to circumvent CPR 27.14 as well as breaching the Consumer Rights Act 2015. DJ Hickinbottom has recently struck more cases out in that court area, stating: ''I find that striking out this claim is the only appropriate manner in which the disapproval of the court can be shown''.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/16qovzulab1szem/G4QZ465V Excel v Wilkinson.pdf?dl=0
You never know how far you can go until you go too far.1 -
All they have done is email a copy of the original 2 year old claim form. , It says for reference only , plus they are not your legal advisor , so don't assume that they will give you 100% accurate information
Follow the advice given on this thread , deal with your local court , copying in Gladstone's on your WS plus Exhibits plus Summary Costs assessment etc , your bundle is due with the local court and Claimant ( in this case via Gladstone's ) , within the timeframe set by the set aside judge
The MCOL website and system works for new claims , but not old ones like yours , which in any case would have ended up with your local court !
Use the Wilkinson case and the Recorder Cohen judgment in your WS plus exhibits2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards