📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pension has finally landed - As an insistent client acting against advice -*DOORS CLOSED 03/09/2021*

Options
1121315171846

Comments

  • Dale72
    Dale72 Posts: 187 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    jimi_man said:
    Dale72 said:
    While the world of investments goes in cycles there must be a point at which you could look at a Sipp and say I think the IFA was wrong to advise not to transfer. At what point is that? (Sipp up 14%) :smile:
    Surely that's rather a superficial way to look at it - purely on the basis of value of whether a SIPP has gone up or down relative to the original DB pension? There are a whole raft of other factors that come into play - health, inheritance, spousal benefits, flexibility, inflation, security, investment risk etc. If the (I)FA is only looking at potential SIPP value then I'd have thought that was a little narrow minded. In some cases the person might well expect to gain more via a SIPP - at the expense of some of the factors above. 

    Indeed just because a SIPP rises in value more than the DB doesn't mean that the person was wrong to transfer. Advice, whether it is financial or otherwise, is based on the facts at the time. That doesn't necessarily render that advice invalid or incorrect further down the line. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

    Also, I'm nowhere near as experienced as some others in the world of stock markets, but basing it on a sustained period of growth over the last few years probably gives a slightly distorted perspective.
    But given the information he sought from me, regarding experience and tolerance to risk, and also the fact he seemed to rely heavily on the returns I'd have to make from investments to give the same payments as the DB pension in his decision to recommend not to transfer, then the Sipp value is overwhelmingly the key fact.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 7 September 2021 at 3:52PM
    Dale72 said:
    Pablo7474 said:
    8% every year over 25 years? Are you investing in individual shares or funds? It would be interesting to know how it goes. 
    Individual shares, 14 of them in the AJ Bell Sipp, all researched or already held elsewhere before the funds arrived, and if I can't do better than 8% a year over any time period then I'll hold my hands up. Not anticipating the need to though.
    You should be working at an investment bank or hedge fund with that level of insight into individual company shares.  
  • Dale72
    Dale72 Posts: 187 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Dale72 said:
    Pablo7474 said:
    8% every year over 25 years? Are you investing in individual shares or funds? It would be interesting to know how it goes. 
    Individual shares, 14 of them in the AJ Bell Sipp, all researched or already held elsewhere before the funds arrived, and if I can't do better than 8% a year over any time period then I'll hold my hands up. Not anticipating the need to though.
    You should be working at an investment bank or hedge fund with that level of insight into individual company shares.  
    I worked for a broker many years ago, and have added to my knowledge since. I think your overestimating the talents of people at those institutions you mention if you think they can do things than the man in the street can't.
  • Dale72 said:
    While the world of investments goes in cycles there must be a point at which you could look at a Sipp and say I think the IFA was wrong to advise not to transfer. At what point is that? (Sipp up 14%) :smile:
    If someone complains about advice to leave a DB pension where it is on the grounds that they were a risk-seeking investor and should have been advised to transfer, the obvious defence from the adviser is "if they wanted the risk so badly why didn't they just transfer against advice". If the response from the complainant/CMC is "it sounded like a faff and I couldn't be bothered", I think even the FOS will struggle to find sympathy with that one.
    The point being of course that you can’t transfer against their advice because there are no longer any vehicles for doing that. A bit of one-way street really with no way back once you’ve taken the advice (and it is “advice” not gospel!) Hey ho, still trawling.. 😀
  • Have you tried the SSAS route yet Jeffmusicals? 
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    The point being of course that you can’t transfer against their advice because there are no longer any vehicles for doing that.
    Yes there are. But if you think it's a faff and can't be bothered it's a free country.
  • jimi_man
    jimi_man Posts: 1,424 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Dale72 said:
    While the world of investments goes in cycles there must be a point at which you could look at a Sipp and say I think the IFA was wrong to advise not to transfer. At what point is that? (Sipp up 14%) :smile:
    If someone complains about advice to leave a DB pension where it is on the grounds that they were a risk-seeking investor and should have been advised to transfer, the obvious defence from the adviser is "if they wanted the risk so badly why didn't they just transfer against advice". If the response from the complainant/CMC is "it sounded like a faff and I couldn't be bothered", I think even the FOS will struggle to find sympathy with that one.
    The point being of course that you can’t transfer against their advice because there are no longer any vehicles for doing that. A bit of one-way street really with no way back once you’ve taken the advice (and it is “advice” not gospel!) Hey ho, still trawling.. 😀
    Well you can transfer against the advice because the rules allow you to. As has been said it is only advice, so there is no compulsion to adhere to it.

    The fact that there aren't (m)any companies willing to do this, is down to the market not wanting the business. If the benefit outweighed the costs (real and potential) then the market would be happy to offer it as it would be a good revenue stream.I'm guessing that for 95% of companies this is not the case which is why there are so few companies offering it. 
  • Well you cannot transfer against advice if there are no practicable routes for the layman to make that transfer.

    If there are, please outline the steps below..
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,799 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Well you cannot transfer against advice if there are no practicable routes for the layman to make that transfer.

    If there are, please outline the steps below..
    You can transfer to a SSAS.    
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Can you take us through the administrative steps for doing that, dunstonh?

    For the client, would it entail  forming a limited company? 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.