We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
First payment of state pension not received
Comments
-
This means that staff are diverted to phones when they should be dealing with "back office" work. And don't forget that those staff are paid less and aren't as well trained as they used to be. All part of the "efficiency savings" that we have seen since 2010. At the end of the day it might well be what you voted for.
It wasn't what I voted for.
And I'm afraid that your response smacks of "Let's blame the customer/client/patient for our own lack of efficiency/competence/training", an attitude all too often seen before the covid shambles and exacerbated afterwards.
2 -
xylophone said:This means that staff are diverted to phones when they should be dealing with "back office" work. And don't forget that those staff are paid less and aren't as well trained as they used to be. All part of the "efficiency savings" that we have seen since 2010. At the end of the day it might well be what you voted for.
It wasn't what I voted for.
And I'm afraid that your response smacks of "Let's blame the customer/client/patient for our own lack of efficiency/competence/training", an attitude all too often seen before the covid shambles and exacerbated afterwards.
3 -
xylophone said:This means that staff are diverted to phones when they should be dealing with "back office" work. And don't forget that those staff are paid less and aren't as well trained as they used to be. All part of the "efficiency savings" that we have seen since 2010. At the end of the day it might well be what you voted for.
It wasn't what I voted for.
And I'm afraid that your response smacks of "Let's blame the customer/client/patient for our own lack of efficiency/competence/training", an attitude all too often seen before the covid shambles and exacerbated afterwards.
0 -
I don't think my response smacks of that at all
"Low value calls" ?
Which being interpreted means those matters which concern the poor lowly member of the public but are quite trivial as far as civil servants are concerned?
To my mind this shows disdain and complacency almost beyond belief and goes a long way to explaining the treatment that these posters (tip of the iceberg?) have received.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78537125/#Comment_78537125
1 -
xylophone said:I don't think my response smacks of that at all
"Low value calls" ?
Which being interpreted means those matters which concern the poor lowly member of the public but are quite trivial as far as civil servants are concerned?
To my mind this shows disdain and complacency almost beyond belief and goes a long way to explaining the treatment that these posters (tip of the iceberg?) have received.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78537125/#Comment_78537125
It seems clear there are problems at the moment within DWP but I have no idea what the reasons are. I would be quite confident however that it isn't "disdain and complacency" at least not from those whose job it is to process pension claims. The vast majority of civil servants I have met work hard to provide the best service they can.4 -
The vast majority of civil servants I have met work hard to provide the best service they can.
Yes, but there is the matter of "corporate" ethos and how far it influences those who provide a public service.
I fear that I am getting the impression that members of the public endeavouring to access such services (whether financial or even medical) are increasingly being treated as petitioners rather than citizens who have a right to their provision.
1 -
german_keeper said:xylophone said:I don't think my response smacks of that at all
"Low value calls" ?
Which being interpreted means those matters which concern the poor lowly member of the public but are quite trivial as far as civil servants are concerned?
To my mind this shows disdain and complacency almost beyond belief and goes a long way to explaining the treatment that these posters (tip of the iceberg?) have received.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/78537125/#Comment_78537125
Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter3 -
By "value", I mean helping DWP achieve it's stated goals and objectives.
Our priorities are to:
- run an effective welfare system that enables people to achieve financial independence by providing assistance and guidance into employment
- increase saving for, and security in, later life
- create a fair and affordable welfare system which improves the life chances of children
- deliver outstanding services to our customers and claimants
If I may offer a real world example. DWP receives a large number of queries from customers each December asking when they will receive their Christmas bonus as they've seen mention of it on social media.I am somewhat surprised that vast numbers of people make an enquiry about this but answering queries is part of the job and part of the service.
And it seems to me that the people who have not only failed to receive their state pensions but also cannot get any explanation as to why, might be raising their eyebrows when they read the statement concerning "outstanding service".
0 -
Outstanding ………… not yet paid, resolved, or dealt with.
2 -
Outstanding ………… not yet paid, resolved, or dealt with.Write to your MP.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards