We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Time limit to FSCS claims - appeal grounds ?

Options
I recently became aware that I may be able to claim against a mismanaged fund & initiated a claim with the FSCS.  Unfortunately, it was rejected on the grounds that too much time had elapsed.  They have said that I should have been aware that I could make a claim starting from Feb 2012, meaning that I had 6 years until Feb 2018 to initiate the complaint.

I do hold up my hands for being spectacularly financially unaware: I was always under the impression that "investments may decrease in value as well as increase" as all the adverts say, and I've never received any indication from the company appointed to deal with the suspended funds that I may be able to make a complaint.  Add this to an estrangement with my father who holds the original documentation, & it meant that I had written off the money that I had lost.

Does anyone know if the 6 year rule is non negotiable, or whether there may be any other grounds to re-open the claim please ?

TIA


"Science is a wonderful thing if one does not have to earn one's living at it" Einstein 1951

Comments

  • No, you've lost the money.
  • Finance time bar rules are not negotiable full stop, just as a firm cannot chase you for a statute barred debt (also 6 years)

    You have 6 years from opening the product and 3 years from when you knew, or could reasonably have known, you had cause for complaint.

    What would your complaint be? That a fund that could go down did so? What evidence is there of mis-management, vs simply poor performance?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 12 August 2021 at 11:59AM
     I was always under the impression that "investments may decrease in value as well as increase" as all the adverts say, and I've never received any indication from the company appointed to deal with the suspended funds that I may be able to make a complaint.
    Every regulated financial services firm includes the complaints process in its documentation.  As does every provider/investment platform and fund house.

    Does anyone know if the 6 year rule is non negotiable, or whether there may be any other grounds to re-open the claim please ?
    No

    Remember that the FSCS only deals with companies that are no longer trading.  The process is different for companies that are still trading and the timebar is more consumer friendly.


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Finance time bar rules are not negotiable full stop, just as a firm cannot chase you for a statute barred debt (also 6 years)
    This isn't accurate. There is some scope for exceptional circumstances or if the individual wasn't aware they had reason to complain at the time. I don't believe the OP's circumstances would count but to suggest it's a blanket rule with no leeway at all could give anyone reading this a misleading view of their situation.
  • Finance time bar rules are not negotiable full stop, just as a firm cannot chase you for a statute barred debt (also 6 years)
    This isn't accurate. There is some scope for exceptional circumstances or if the individual wasn't aware they had reason to complain at the time. I don't believe the OP's circumstances would count but to suggest it's a blanket rule with no leeway at all could give anyone reading this a misleading view of their situation.
    The 3 year rule is that a person knew, or could reasonably have known, they had reason to complain. You cannot just pick arbitrary dates out of thin air and say that was when you knew. There are multiple triggers for the 3 year rule, customer contact letters (CCLs), annual statement of benefit/cost with advice on free alternatives etc. There are very rarely exceptions yes like with PPI but customer simply claiming they didn't know is not one of them, if it can be shown they could reasonably have known.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.